Quality of Work Life among Public Health Nurses: A Survey Comparison between Thailand and Japan

Patcharee Komjakraphan, K. Tsuruta, Tamayo Hasagawa, Toshihiko Yanagita, A. Hombu, Piyanuch Jitanoon, Karnsunaphat Balthip
{"title":"Quality of Work Life among Public Health Nurses: A Survey Comparison between Thailand and Japan","authors":"Patcharee Komjakraphan, K. Tsuruta, Tamayo Hasagawa, Toshihiko Yanagita, A. Hombu, Piyanuch Jitanoon, Karnsunaphat Balthip","doi":"10.48048/wjst.2020.4315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers from Thailand and Japan have initiated a collaborative project to compare the Quality of Work Life (QWL) among public health nurses. Thus, the QWL of registered nurses working in a community in Thailand was identified and compared with the Public Health Nurses (PHNs) in Japan. The purpose of which was to determine the similarities and differences between the two countries regarding their nurses’ quality of work life. The 42-item of Brooks’ survey of Quality of Nursing Work Life (QNWL) was translated and evaluated in Thailand and Japan. There were 102 Thai and 209 Japanese public health nurses completed the questionnaire. \nFindings showed that the QNWL level of both Thai and Japanese PHNs were at moderate level. Thai nurses scored higher than Japanese nurses in overall scores. Thai reported significantly higher on work design dimensions (t = 9.12, p < 0.05). For both groups, three out of four dimensions were ranked in the same pattern in which home life/work life was recorded as the lowest. This was followed by work design and work context. However, Thai scored lowest on work world dimension, while Japanese scored highest on that dimension. Findings also showed significant association between country and age groups (χ2 = 20.01, p = 0.00, marital status (χ2 = 6.50, p = 0.01), education (χ2 = 70.05, p = 0.00), and dependent family members (χ2 = 128.16, p = 0.00). No significant association was noted between country and gender (χ2 = 0.37, p = 0.54), and between country and work experience (χ2 = 2.88, p = 0.23).The findings extended our understanding of the Public Health Nurse’s quality of work life that contributes to nursing in different cultural contexts through a rare direct comparison of Public Health Nurses between Thailand and Japan.","PeriodicalId":255195,"journal":{"name":"Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Walailak Journal of Science and Technology (WJST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48048/wjst.2020.4315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Researchers from Thailand and Japan have initiated a collaborative project to compare the Quality of Work Life (QWL) among public health nurses. Thus, the QWL of registered nurses working in a community in Thailand was identified and compared with the Public Health Nurses (PHNs) in Japan. The purpose of which was to determine the similarities and differences between the two countries regarding their nurses’ quality of work life. The 42-item of Brooks’ survey of Quality of Nursing Work Life (QNWL) was translated and evaluated in Thailand and Japan. There were 102 Thai and 209 Japanese public health nurses completed the questionnaire. Findings showed that the QNWL level of both Thai and Japanese PHNs were at moderate level. Thai nurses scored higher than Japanese nurses in overall scores. Thai reported significantly higher on work design dimensions (t = 9.12, p < 0.05). For both groups, three out of four dimensions were ranked in the same pattern in which home life/work life was recorded as the lowest. This was followed by work design and work context. However, Thai scored lowest on work world dimension, while Japanese scored highest on that dimension. Findings also showed significant association between country and age groups (χ2 = 20.01, p = 0.00, marital status (χ2 = 6.50, p = 0.01), education (χ2 = 70.05, p = 0.00), and dependent family members (χ2 = 128.16, p = 0.00). No significant association was noted between country and gender (χ2 = 0.37, p = 0.54), and between country and work experience (χ2 = 2.88, p = 0.23).The findings extended our understanding of the Public Health Nurse’s quality of work life that contributes to nursing in different cultural contexts through a rare direct comparison of Public Health Nurses between Thailand and Japan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰国与日本公共卫生护士工作生活质量调查比较
来自泰国和日本的研究人员发起了一个合作项目,比较公共卫生护士的工作生活质量(QWL)。因此,我们确定了在泰国某社区工作的注册护士的QWL,并与日本的公共卫生护士(phn)进行了比较。其目的是确定两国护士工作生活质量的异同。布鲁克斯的护理工作生活质量调查(QNWL)的42个项目在泰国和日本进行了翻译和评估。共有102名泰国公共卫生护士和209名日本公共卫生护士完成问卷。结果显示,泰国和日本phn的QNWL水平均处于中等水平。泰国护士的总体得分高于日本护士。泰国在工作设计维度上的报告显著高于泰国(t = 9.12, p < 0.05)。对于这两组人来说,四个维度中有三个维度的排名模式相同,其中家庭生活/工作生活被记录为最低。其次是工作设计和工作环境。然而,泰国人在工作世界这一维度上得分最低,而日本人在这一维度上得分最高。国家和年龄(χ2 = 20.01, p = 0.00)、婚姻状况(χ2 = 6.50, p = 0.01)、受教育程度(χ2 = 70.05, p = 0.00)、受抚养家庭成员(χ2 = 128.16, p = 0.00)之间也存在显著相关性。国家和性别之间无显著相关性(χ2 = 0.37, p = 0.54),国家和工作经验之间无显著相关性(χ2 = 2.88, p = 0.23)。通过对泰国和日本的公共卫生护士进行罕见的直接比较,研究结果扩展了我们对不同文化背景下公共卫生护士工作生活质量的理解,这有助于护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of the Simple Verification Method to Estimate the Weather at Makassar Maritime Station, Indonesia Experimental Investigation of Process Parameters of Al-SiC-B4C MMCs Finished by a Novel Magnetic Abrasive Flow Machining Setup Soil Chemical Properties and Maize (Zea mays L.) Yield influenced by Lime and Fern (Pteris vittata) A Single Mutation in the Carbohydrate-Binding Module Enhances Cellulase Activity in Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens Mutant A Study of the Extragalactic UV Radiation in Helix Nebula using GALEX
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1