The Added Value of a Dedicated Cardiac CT Scanner for the Assessment of Coronary Calcium

M. J. W. Greuter, J. M. Groen
{"title":"The Added Value of a Dedicated Cardiac CT Scanner for the Assessment of Coronary Calcium","authors":"M. J. W. Greuter,&nbsp;J. M. Groen","doi":"10.1111/j.1617-0830.2008.00123.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The amount of coronary calcium is generally used as an indicator for risk stratification of patients with (suspected) coronary artery disease. Orginally, electron beam tomography (EBT) was used to image the amount of coronary calcium and quantification was performed by the Agatston score. Risk stratification has been validated on large patients populations using the EBT scanner in combination with this scoring method. While EBT scanners become more and more obsolete nowadays, these scanners are being replaced by multi-detector computer tomography (MDCT) systems and dedicated cardio scanners like dual source computer tomography (DSCT). However, in order to used the calcium score obtained from a patient scan on these systems, it must be demonstrated to be accurate, clinically relevant and reproducible. In this study we compared the infiuence of cardiac motion on the calcium score for a 64-slice MDCT scanner and for an EBT and a DSCT systems. A moving cardiac phantom was used and the measured Agatston scores were compared on these three systems as a function of heart rate, calcification density and slice thickness. The results show that DSCT is approximately 50% less susceptible to cardiac motion than 64-slice MDCT and that the susceptibility is further reduced by using a smaller slice thickness. At a slice thickness of 3.0 mm DSCT and 64-slice MDCT show similar results, however, at a slice thickness of 0.6 mm DSCT gives the best approximation of the calcium score on EBT in comparison to 64-slice MDCT.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":89151,"journal":{"name":"Imaging decisions (Berlin, Germany)","volume":"12 2","pages":"10-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1617-0830.2008.00123.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging decisions (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1617-0830.2008.00123.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The amount of coronary calcium is generally used as an indicator for risk stratification of patients with (suspected) coronary artery disease. Orginally, electron beam tomography (EBT) was used to image the amount of coronary calcium and quantification was performed by the Agatston score. Risk stratification has been validated on large patients populations using the EBT scanner in combination with this scoring method. While EBT scanners become more and more obsolete nowadays, these scanners are being replaced by multi-detector computer tomography (MDCT) systems and dedicated cardio scanners like dual source computer tomography (DSCT). However, in order to used the calcium score obtained from a patient scan on these systems, it must be demonstrated to be accurate, clinically relevant and reproducible. In this study we compared the infiuence of cardiac motion on the calcium score for a 64-slice MDCT scanner and for an EBT and a DSCT systems. A moving cardiac phantom was used and the measured Agatston scores were compared on these three systems as a function of heart rate, calcification density and slice thickness. The results show that DSCT is approximately 50% less susceptible to cardiac motion than 64-slice MDCT and that the susceptibility is further reduced by using a smaller slice thickness. At a slice thickness of 3.0 mm DSCT and 64-slice MDCT show similar results, however, at a slice thickness of 0.6 mm DSCT gives the best approximation of the calcium score on EBT in comparison to 64-slice MDCT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏专用CT扫描仪对冠状动脉钙化评估的附加价值
冠状动脉钙含量通常作为(疑似)冠状动脉疾病患者危险分层的指标。最初,使用电子束断层扫描(EBT)来成像冠状动脉钙含量,并通过Agatston评分进行量化。使用EBT扫描仪结合该评分方法,在大量患者人群中验证了风险分层。虽然EBT扫描仪现在变得越来越过时,但这些扫描仪正在被多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)系统和专用心脏扫描仪(如双源计算机断层扫描(DSCT))所取代。然而,为了在这些系统上使用从患者扫描中获得的钙评分,必须证明它是准确的、临床相关的和可重复的。在这项研究中,我们比较了心脏运动对64层MDCT扫描仪、EBT和DSCT系统钙评分的影响。使用移动的心脏假体,比较这三种系统测量的Agatston评分作为心率、钙化密度和切片厚度的函数。结果表明,与64层MDCT相比,DSCT对心脏运动的敏感性降低了约50%,并且通过使用更小的层厚度进一步降低了敏感性。在3.0 mm层厚的DSCT和64层MDCT显示相似的结果,然而,与64层MDCT相比,0.6 mm层厚的DSCT给出了EBT钙评分的最佳近似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Problem-Solving Modality? Spectroscopic Imaging of Breast Cancer Breast MR-Imaging of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Systematic Review Understanding and Application of Different Breast Imaging Studies Breast Imaging, Overview and New Developments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1