Robbing the Rich to Feed the Poor

Jennifer Brown
{"title":"Robbing the Rich to Feed the Poor","authors":"Jennifer Brown","doi":"10.1525/NCLR.1999.3.1.261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The somewhat provocative title of this essay refers to the possibility that under the Crime Victims Fund administered by United States Department of Justice Office for Victims of Crime, victims of federal crimes might go without full compensation for the harm they've suffered, while assets seized from their offenders are channeled to a different group of people altogether: victims of state crimes. Since 1985, over 2 billion dollars in fines, asset forfeitures, and other special assessments--generated mostly by white collar, corporate crime--have been deposited into the Crime Victims Fund. This money in turn supports federal courts as well as programs to compensate and assist victims of state law crimes, principally rape, domestic abuse, child abuse, and child sexual abuse. While the recipients of these benefits--many in under-served rural areas and inner-city neighborhoods--are clearly deserving of such assistance, this article raises the possibility that some federal crime victims are getting lost in the shuffle. The article explains the circumstances which might give rise to this redistribution from federal to state crime victims. It also proposes modest changes in the language and implementation of the restitution statute to protect federal victims from such losses.","PeriodicalId":344882,"journal":{"name":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.1999.3.1.261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The somewhat provocative title of this essay refers to the possibility that under the Crime Victims Fund administered by United States Department of Justice Office for Victims of Crime, victims of federal crimes might go without full compensation for the harm they've suffered, while assets seized from their offenders are channeled to a different group of people altogether: victims of state crimes. Since 1985, over 2 billion dollars in fines, asset forfeitures, and other special assessments--generated mostly by white collar, corporate crime--have been deposited into the Crime Victims Fund. This money in turn supports federal courts as well as programs to compensate and assist victims of state law crimes, principally rape, domestic abuse, child abuse, and child sexual abuse. While the recipients of these benefits--many in under-served rural areas and inner-city neighborhoods--are clearly deserving of such assistance, this article raises the possibility that some federal crime victims are getting lost in the shuffle. The article explains the circumstances which might give rise to this redistribution from federal to state crime victims. It also proposes modest changes in the language and implementation of the restitution statute to protect federal victims from such losses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
劫富济贫
这篇文章的标题有些挑衅性,指的是在美国司法部犯罪受害者办公室管理的犯罪受害者基金下,联邦犯罪的受害者可能得不到对他们所遭受的伤害的全额赔偿,而从罪犯那里没收的资产则被完全转移到另一群人手中:州犯罪的受害者。自1985年以来,超过20亿美元的罚款、资产没收和其他特别评估——主要由白领和企业犯罪产生——已存入犯罪受害者基金。这笔钱反过来支持联邦法院以及赔偿和援助州法律犯罪受害者的项目,主要是强奸、家庭虐待、虐待儿童和儿童性虐待。虽然这些福利的接受者——许多生活在服务水平低下的农村地区和内城社区——显然应该得到这样的帮助,但这篇文章提出了一种可能性,即一些联邦犯罪受害者在混乱中迷失了方向。这篇文章解释了可能导致这种从联邦犯罪受害者到州犯罪受害者再分配的情况。它还建议对赔偿法规的语言和执行进行适度的修改,以保护联邦受害者免受此类损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Murder After the Merger: A Commentary on Finkelstein Group Violence and Group Vengeance: Toward a Retributivist Theory of International Criminal Law Benthamite Reflections on Codification of the General Principles of Criminal Liability: Towards the Panopticon The Politics of Grace: On the Moral Justification of Executive Clemency Toward a Better Categorical Balance of the Costs and Benefits of the Exclusionary Rule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1