DRUG UTILIZATION EVALUATION OF MACROLIDES IN ENT OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT IN TEACHING HOSPITAL PUNJAB, PAKISTAN.

Misbah Naz, A. Gillani, Muhammad Amjad, Muhammad Zaman, Muhammad Hassan Akbar, Sharjeel Ahmed, Jamshaid Akbar, Sameer Ali
{"title":"DRUG UTILIZATION EVALUATION OF MACROLIDES IN ENT OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT IN TEACHING HOSPITAL PUNJAB, PAKISTAN.","authors":"Misbah Naz, A. Gillani, Muhammad Amjad, Muhammad Zaman, Muhammad Hassan Akbar, Sharjeel Ahmed, Jamshaid Akbar, Sameer Ali","doi":"10.56536/ijpihs.v3i2.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A major danger to the health care system is the rise in antibiotic resistance. The aim of current Study is to evaluate the comparison defined daily dose (DDD) and prescribed daily dose (PDD) of macrolide and to evaluate the prescribing pattern of the drug, either it met the standards or not. Methodology: Quantitative, retrospective study was carried out to measure the use of antibiotics specifically macrolide antibiotics in ENT outdoor department of teaching hospital Punjab, Pakistan. Study research from August 2021 to October 2021, the patient who was reported in OPD of ENT department during study period of 3 month retrospectively. Results: Total 438 prescriptions were collected and reviewed to evaluate the prescribing pattern of macrolides in outdoor patients of ENT department. Out of 438 prescriptions only in one prescription 10 antibiotics was prescribe (polypharmacy) and in 19(4.3%) prescriptions only one antibiotic is prescribed. Drug prescribed by their generic were 438(100). Encounter with antibiotics 95%. All drug were prescribed from essential drug list (EDL). Azithromycin was the most commonly prescribed drug in ENT department, followed by clarithromycin. Conclusion: Control bacterial resistance is become challenge to our health care system, major portion of our population is become resistance to majority classes of antibiotic if this practice will continue in future, it became difficult to control or treat infectious diseases. Irrational use of drugs, over prescribing of antibiotics and brand prescribing were observing during the study. Lack of knowledge and non-adherence to the prescribing indicators are the major factors that contribute towards the irrational drug prescribing that ultimately leads towards the antibiotics resistance.","PeriodicalId":142550,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy & Integrated Health Sciences","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy & Integrated Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56536/ijpihs.v3i2.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A major danger to the health care system is the rise in antibiotic resistance. The aim of current Study is to evaluate the comparison defined daily dose (DDD) and prescribed daily dose (PDD) of macrolide and to evaluate the prescribing pattern of the drug, either it met the standards or not. Methodology: Quantitative, retrospective study was carried out to measure the use of antibiotics specifically macrolide antibiotics in ENT outdoor department of teaching hospital Punjab, Pakistan. Study research from August 2021 to October 2021, the patient who was reported in OPD of ENT department during study period of 3 month retrospectively. Results: Total 438 prescriptions were collected and reviewed to evaluate the prescribing pattern of macrolides in outdoor patients of ENT department. Out of 438 prescriptions only in one prescription 10 antibiotics was prescribe (polypharmacy) and in 19(4.3%) prescriptions only one antibiotic is prescribed. Drug prescribed by their generic were 438(100). Encounter with antibiotics 95%. All drug were prescribed from essential drug list (EDL). Azithromycin was the most commonly prescribed drug in ENT department, followed by clarithromycin. Conclusion: Control bacterial resistance is become challenge to our health care system, major portion of our population is become resistance to majority classes of antibiotic if this practice will continue in future, it became difficult to control or treat infectious diseases. Irrational use of drugs, over prescribing of antibiotics and brand prescribing were observing during the study. Lack of knowledge and non-adherence to the prescribing indicators are the major factors that contribute towards the irrational drug prescribing that ultimately leads towards the antibiotics resistance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旁遮普教学医院门诊部大环内酯类药物利用评价。
背景:卫生保健系统面临的一个主要危险是抗生素耐药性的上升。本研究的目的是评价大环内酯类药物的定义日剂量(DDD)与处方日剂量(PDD)的比较,并评价大环内酯类药物的处方模式是否符合标准。方法:对巴基斯坦旁遮普省某教学医院耳鼻喉科室外部抗生素特别是大环内酯类抗生素的使用情况进行定量、回顾性研究。研究于2021年8月至2021年10月对研究期间3个月在耳鼻喉科OPD报告的患者进行回顾性研究。结果:共收集438张处方,对耳鼻喉科户外患者大环内酯类药物的处方模式进行评价。在438张处方中,一张处方中只开了10种抗生素(多药),19张(4.3%)处方中只开了一种抗生素。其中仿制药438种(100种)。95%的人使用抗生素。所有药物均按基本药物目录(EDL)开具。耳鼻喉科用药最多的是阿奇霉素,其次是克拉霉素。结论:控制细菌耐药性已成为我国卫生保健系统面临的挑战,我国大部分人群已对大多数种类的抗生素产生耐药性,如果这种做法继续下去,将给控制和治疗传染病带来困难。在研究过程中,观察到不合理用药、抗生素过度处方和品牌处方的情况。缺乏知识和不遵守处方指标是导致处方不合理的主要因素,最终导致抗生素耐药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EDITORIAL: PIONEERING THE FUTURE OF HEALTHCARE THROUGH ADVANCES IN NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT OF SEVERITY OF IRON DEFICIENCY AND ASSOCIATED RISK FACTORS AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NEW RP-HPLC METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF SOFOSBUVIR AND DACLATASVIR CHARACTERIZATION AND PHARMACEUTICAL EVALUATION OF DAUCUS CAROTA PECTIN AS A SUSPENDING AGENT IN ORAL DOSAGE FORMS THE PRESCRIBING TRENDS OF ACE-INHIBITORS AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITALS OF HAZARA REGION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1