El Sistema Privado de Salud Desde La Perspectiva del Analisis Economico

R. Barcia
{"title":"El Sistema Privado de Salud Desde La Perspectiva del Analisis Economico","authors":"R. Barcia","doi":"10.5354/0719-7462.2004.41892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the legal regulation of ISAPREs from the vantage point of law and economics and makes a case for passing some amendments to this private health system based on market failures. The private health system of ISAPREs has not been able to satisfy the expectations of third age people who are discriminated against by an adverse selection. This article explains how this adverse selection works and accounts for the inability of ISAPREs to efectively compete in that market segment. In addition, it puts forward a solution to this problem consisting in a new market of indefinite health contracts which creates a new value and gives confidence to risk adverse individuals. This new market shall also create incentives for ISAPREs to compete in the segment of third age people and obtain important scale economies in their costs, besides giving them leverage to negotiate under equal conditions on behalf of their affiliates in the market of catastrophic diseases, in which there is a truly monopoly at the hand of the medical profession.","PeriodicalId":393808,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Program in Law & Economics","volume":"488 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Program in Law & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-7462.2004.41892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal regulation of ISAPREs from the vantage point of law and economics and makes a case for passing some amendments to this private health system based on market failures. The private health system of ISAPREs has not been able to satisfy the expectations of third age people who are discriminated against by an adverse selection. This article explains how this adverse selection works and accounts for the inability of ISAPREs to efectively compete in that market segment. In addition, it puts forward a solution to this problem consisting in a new market of indefinite health contracts which creates a new value and gives confidence to risk adverse individuals. This new market shall also create incentives for ISAPREs to compete in the segment of third age people and obtain important scale economies in their costs, besides giving them leverage to negotiate under equal conditions on behalf of their affiliates in the market of catastrophic diseases, in which there is a truly monopoly at the hand of the medical profession.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济分析视角下的私人医疗体系
本文从法学和经济学的角度分析了ISAPREs的法律规制,并提出了基于市场失灵对这一私营医疗体系进行修改的理由。ISAPREs的私人保健系统未能满足因逆向选择而受到歧视的第三年龄人群的期望。本文解释了这种逆向选择是如何工作的,并解释了ISAPREs无法在该细分市场中有效竞争的原因。此外,本文还提出了一种解决这一问题的方法,即建立一个新的无限期健康合同市场,创造新的价值,使风险规避者有信心。这个新市场还将激励ISAPREs在第三年龄人群的细分市场中竞争,并在成本上获得重要的规模经济,此外,还将使ISAPREs具有在同等条件下代表其附属机构在灾难性疾病市场进行谈判的杠杆作用,在这个市场中,医疗行业真正处于垄断地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Default Rules and the Inevitability of Paternalism The Unseen Elephant: What Blocks Judicial System Improvement? Economia Política da Disputa por Terras em Minas Gerais THE BIT GENERATION’S EMERGENCE AS A COLLECTIVE ACTION PROBLEM: Prisoner's dilemma or network effects? Robin Hood Vs. King John Redistribution: How Do Local Judges Decide Cases in Brazil?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1