The Relationship Between a Historical Manuscript and its Digital Surrogate

Olivia Staciwa
{"title":"The Relationship Between a Historical Manuscript and its Digital Surrogate","authors":"Olivia Staciwa","doi":"10.29173/pathfinder51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through the digitization of rare or special manuscripts, academics have researched the impact of digitization and its relationship with the physical manuscript itself. Past literature has focused on how the digital can complement the physical, the changing manuscript’s identity when its digitized, and past research around the quality of a digital surrogate. The importance of carefully considering the impact of the quality of a digitized manuscript is essential. However, every edition (physical or digital) changes in some way and moves further from the original, be it an issue with the digitization or pages being removed or altered in the physical manuscript. Though some scholars find that content may be lost when digitized, there can also be more information added by cataloguers. Ultimately, digital surrogates allow for wider access, but their quality must be considered and properly addressed in research. A researcher who is aware of and within their work clearly states the relationship between the digital surrogate and the physical manuscript will find that it is a great support for any researcher. ","PeriodicalId":343807,"journal":{"name":"Pathfinder: A Canadian Journal for Information Science Students and Early Career Professionals","volume":"162 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathfinder: A Canadian Journal for Information Science Students and Early Career Professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/pathfinder51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through the digitization of rare or special manuscripts, academics have researched the impact of digitization and its relationship with the physical manuscript itself. Past literature has focused on how the digital can complement the physical, the changing manuscript’s identity when its digitized, and past research around the quality of a digital surrogate. The importance of carefully considering the impact of the quality of a digitized manuscript is essential. However, every edition (physical or digital) changes in some way and moves further from the original, be it an issue with the digitization or pages being removed or altered in the physical manuscript. Though some scholars find that content may be lost when digitized, there can also be more information added by cataloguers. Ultimately, digital surrogates allow for wider access, but their quality must be considered and properly addressed in research. A researcher who is aware of and within their work clearly states the relationship between the digital surrogate and the physical manuscript will find that it is a great support for any researcher. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史手稿与其数字代理之间的关系
通过珍稀或特殊手稿的数字化,学术界研究了数字化的影响及其与实体手稿本身的关系。过去的文献主要关注数字化如何与实体手稿相辅相成、数字化后手稿身份的变化,以及过去围绕数字代用品质量的研究。仔细考虑数字化手稿质量的影响至关重要。然而,每个版本(实体版或数字版)都会以某种方式发生变化,并进一步偏离原作,无论是数字化的问题还是实体手稿中被删除或修改的页面。虽然有些学者发现数字化后可能会丢失内容,但编目员也可以添加更多信息。最终,数字化的代用版本允许更广泛的使用,但在研究中必须考虑并妥善处理其质量问题。如果研究人员意识到并在其工作中明确说明数字代用版与实体手稿之间的关系,就会发现数字代用版对任何研究人员来说都是一个巨大的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sexual Assault Survivors and Information: Needs and Recommendations Public Library Play-based Early Literacy Programs: What is the Parental Experience? Examining the "Culture of Assessment" in Public Libraries Reflecting on our Time as Digital Literacies Librarians Evolving Nature of Library Technical Services in Response to Outsourcing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1