Legislative Harmonization of Brazilian Data Protection Law with EU GDPR: A Comparative Study on the EU GDPR and Brazil's LGPD

Hansol Kim
{"title":"Legislative Harmonization of Brazilian Data Protection Law with EU GDPR: A Comparative Study on the EU GDPR and Brazil's LGPD","authors":"Hansol Kim","doi":"10.58555/li.2022.2.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, major countries and international organizations, including the European Union, are reforming their personal data protection system, which is understood to seek the reasonable balance between the protection of personal information and communication technologies that have developed rapidly over the past three decades. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), enacted by the EU in May 2016, is the world's most powerful privacy system now, and since the GDPR was enacted, EU trade partners have been actively striving to align their own data protection legislations with the GDPR by adopting and amending theirs to meet the global data protection standards. Brazil, as Latin America's economic giant, has also spent a long time finding the balance point between creating economic profits and protecting human rights under the pressure of mediating the conflicting values of using and protecting personal information. As a result of the conflict, the Brazilian General Data Protection Regulation(LGPD), affected by the EU GDPR, was passed on August 15, 2018 after eight years of discussion. This study began with questions about how specific the Brazilian LGPD was influenced by the European GDPR and how these two legislations were harmonized in the global society. We examined the system and status of Brazil's personal information legislation, as well as the legislative progress of the new legislation, and went on to conduct comparative legal reviews of the two legislations to find out the similarities and differences between them. Furthermore, we looked at the implications of Brazilian legislation for our legislation and sought compatibility between the value of privacy protection and the development of information technology.","PeriodicalId":115318,"journal":{"name":"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Center for Legislative Studies, Gyeongin National University of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58555/li.2022.2.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, major countries and international organizations, including the European Union, are reforming their personal data protection system, which is understood to seek the reasonable balance between the protection of personal information and communication technologies that have developed rapidly over the past three decades. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), enacted by the EU in May 2016, is the world's most powerful privacy system now, and since the GDPR was enacted, EU trade partners have been actively striving to align their own data protection legislations with the GDPR by adopting and amending theirs to meet the global data protection standards. Brazil, as Latin America's economic giant, has also spent a long time finding the balance point between creating economic profits and protecting human rights under the pressure of mediating the conflicting values of using and protecting personal information. As a result of the conflict, the Brazilian General Data Protection Regulation(LGPD), affected by the EU GDPR, was passed on August 15, 2018 after eight years of discussion. This study began with questions about how specific the Brazilian LGPD was influenced by the European GDPR and how these two legislations were harmonized in the global society. We examined the system and status of Brazil's personal information legislation, as well as the legislative progress of the new legislation, and went on to conduct comparative legal reviews of the two legislations to find out the similarities and differences between them. Furthermore, we looked at the implications of Brazilian legislation for our legislation and sought compatibility between the value of privacy protection and the development of information technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西数据保护法与欧盟GDPR的立法协调:欧盟GDPR与巴西LGPD的比较研究
最近,包括欧盟在内的主要国家和国际组织正在对其个人数据保护制度进行改革,这被理解为在个人信息保护与过去三十年快速发展的通信技术之间寻求合理的平衡。欧盟于2016年5月颁布的《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)是目前世界上最强大的隐私保护制度,自GDPR颁布以来,欧盟贸易伙伴一直在积极努力使自己的数据保护立法与GDPR保持一致,通过采用和修改自己的数据保护立法来满足全球数据保护标准。巴西作为拉丁美洲的经济巨人,在调解个人信息使用与保护价值冲突的压力下,也花了很长时间在创造经济利益与保护人权之间寻找平衡点。由于这一冲突,受欧盟GDPR影响的巴西《通用数据保护条例》(LGPD)经过八年的讨论后于2018年8月15日获得通过。本研究首先探讨了欧洲GDPR对巴西LGPD的具体影响,以及这两项立法如何在全球社会中协调一致。我们考察了巴西个人信息立法的制度和现状,以及新立法的立法进展,并对两项立法进行了比较法律审查,找出两者的异同。此外,我们还研究了巴西立法对我国立法的影响,并寻求隐私保护价值与信息技术发展之间的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
입법영향분석 어떻게 할 것인가? Principles and Limitations of Using Personal Location Data for Public Interest: Implications for Legislative Technology of Personal Data Protection Act A study on the revision of the “Security Guard Act” and the establishment of 'Congestion Guard' in Japan The Normative Power of the Inter-Korean Agreement The Gap in the Legal Texts and the Supplementation by Interpretation - Focusing on the provisions and interpretations of property rights under Article 23 of the Constitution -
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1