Towards a Common Safety Ontology for Automobiles and Railway Vehicles

B. Hulin, H. Kaindl, Thomas Rathfux, R. Popp, Edin Arnautovic, Roland Beckert
{"title":"Towards a Common Safety Ontology for Automobiles and Railway Vehicles","authors":"B. Hulin, H. Kaindl, Thomas Rathfux, R. Popp, Edin Arnautovic, Roland Beckert","doi":"10.1109/EDCC.2016.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automobiles and railway vehicles have their specific safety standards, respectively. Still, they are both land vehicles and thus share a large set of common hazards and accident types. This calls for a common safety ontology covering both domains. Apart from many commonalities, we found some important differences between safety standards of these domains, in particular between ISO 26262, EN 50126 and SIRF (the German Standard for railway vehicles). Based on their respective glossaries, we attempted to resolve certain differences. This led us to a common set of formalized concepts and their relations. We consider this as an important step towards a common ontology for automobiles and railway vehicles. Such an ontology should facilitate the reuse of hazard and risk analyses from one domain to the other, and it should have important application areas.","PeriodicalId":166039,"journal":{"name":"2016 12th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC)","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 12th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDCC.2016.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Automobiles and railway vehicles have their specific safety standards, respectively. Still, they are both land vehicles and thus share a large set of common hazards and accident types. This calls for a common safety ontology covering both domains. Apart from many commonalities, we found some important differences between safety standards of these domains, in particular between ISO 26262, EN 50126 and SIRF (the German Standard for railway vehicles). Based on their respective glossaries, we attempted to resolve certain differences. This led us to a common set of formalized concepts and their relations. We consider this as an important step towards a common ontology for automobiles and railway vehicles. Such an ontology should facilitate the reuse of hazard and risk analyses from one domain to the other, and it should have important application areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向汽车和轨道车辆的通用安全本体
汽车和轨道车辆分别有其特定的安全标准。不过,它们都是陆地车辆,因此有很多共同的危险和事故类型。这就需要一个涵盖这两个领域的通用安全本体。除了许多共同点之外,我们发现这些领域的安全标准之间存在一些重要差异,特别是ISO 26262, EN 50126和SIRF(德国铁路车辆标准)之间。根据他们各自的词汇,我们试图解决某些差异。这使我们得到了一组共同的形式化概念及其关系。我们认为这是朝着汽车和轨道车辆共同本体迈出的重要一步。这样的本体应该促进从一个领域到另一个领域的危害和风险分析的重用,并且它应该具有重要的应用领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assuring Dependable Cloud-Based System Engineering: A Cloud Accountability Method Diversity, Safety and Security in Embedded Systems: Modelling Adversary Effort and Supply Chain Risks 3D-DPS: An Efficient 3D-CAC for Reliable Data Transfer in 3D ICs Dwarf: Shortening Downtime of Reboot-Based Kernel Updates Practical Emulation of Software Defects in Source Code
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1