The Foxfire of Fair Use: The Google Books Litigation and the Future of Copyright Laws

Matthew Rimmer
{"title":"The Foxfire of Fair Use: The Google Books Litigation and the Future of Copyright Laws","authors":"Matthew Rimmer","doi":"10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190228613.013.274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright exceptions and limitations in the United States have experienced dynamic evolution in light of new technological developments. There has been significant legal debate in the courts and in the United States Congress about the scope of the defense of fair use. The copyright litigation over Google Books has been a landmark development in the modern history of copyright law. The victory by Google, Inc., over the Authors Guild in the decade-long copyright dispute is an important milestone for copyright law. The ruling of Leval J emphasizes that the defense of fair use in the United States plays a critical role in promoting transformative creativity, freedom of speech, and innovation. The Supreme Court of the United States was decisive in its rejection of the Authors Guild’s efforts to challenge the decision of Leval J. There has been significant debate in the United States Copyright Office and United States Congress over the development of “the Next Great Copyright Act.” Hearings have taken place within the United States Congressional system about the history, nature, and future of the defense of fair use under United States copyright law. There remains much debate about the internationalization of the defense of fair use, and the need for the trading partners of the United States to enjoy similar flexibilities with respect to copyright exceptions. There has been concern about the impact of mega-regional trade agreements—such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership—upon copyright exceptions, such as the defense of fair use.","PeriodicalId":368986,"journal":{"name":"Queensland University of Technology (QUT) - Law & Justice Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Queensland University of Technology (QUT) - Law & Justice Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190228613.013.274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Copyright exceptions and limitations in the United States have experienced dynamic evolution in light of new technological developments. There has been significant legal debate in the courts and in the United States Congress about the scope of the defense of fair use. The copyright litigation over Google Books has been a landmark development in the modern history of copyright law. The victory by Google, Inc., over the Authors Guild in the decade-long copyright dispute is an important milestone for copyright law. The ruling of Leval J emphasizes that the defense of fair use in the United States plays a critical role in promoting transformative creativity, freedom of speech, and innovation. The Supreme Court of the United States was decisive in its rejection of the Authors Guild’s efforts to challenge the decision of Leval J. There has been significant debate in the United States Copyright Office and United States Congress over the development of “the Next Great Copyright Act.” Hearings have taken place within the United States Congressional system about the history, nature, and future of the defense of fair use under United States copyright law. There remains much debate about the internationalization of the defense of fair use, and the need for the trading partners of the United States to enjoy similar flexibilities with respect to copyright exceptions. There has been concern about the impact of mega-regional trade agreements—such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership—upon copyright exceptions, such as the defense of fair use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合理使用的火狐:谷歌图书诉讼和版权法的未来
随着新技术的发展,美国的版权例外和限制经历了动态的演变。法院和美国国会对合理使用的辩护范围进行了重大的法律辩论。谷歌图书的版权诉讼是现代版权法历史上具有里程碑意义的发展。谷歌公司(Google, Inc.)在长达十年的版权纠纷中战胜美国作家协会(Authors Guild)是版权法的一个重要里程碑。Leval J的裁决强调,在美国,对合理使用的辩护在促进变革性创造力、言论自由和创新方面起着至关重要的作用。美国最高法院果断地驳回了作家协会挑战Leval J.判决的努力。在美国版权局和美国国会就“下一个伟大版权法”的发展进行了重大辩论。美国国会系统已经就美国版权法下合理使用辩护的历史、性质和未来举行了听证会。关于合理使用辩护的国际化,以及美国的贸易伙伴是否需要在版权例外方面享有类似的灵活性,仍然存在许多争论。人们一直担心大型区域贸易协定——比如跨太平洋伙伴关系协定——对版权例外的影响,比如对合理使用的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Foxfire of Fair Use: The Google Books Litigation and the Future of Copyright Laws 3D Printing Jurassic Park: Copyright Law, Cultural Institutions, and Makerspaces Futility and the Law: Knowledge, Practice and Attitudes of Doctors in End of Life Care Guest Editorial: End of Life Law, Ethics, Policy and Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1