HASIL PERBEDAAN DAN AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR AND SHARE DAN DECISION MAKING

Chissy, Husnarika Febrianti, Khairuna
{"title":"HASIL PERBEDAAN DAN AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIR AND SHARE DAN DECISION MAKING","authors":"Chissy, Husnarika Febrianti, Khairuna","doi":"10.47006/pendalas.v2i2.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the differences in student learning outcomes using the Think Pair And Share and Decision Making learning models on the subject matter of the Human Movement System in class VIII MTs BIMA in the 2020/2021 academic year. This research is a quantitative research, with the type of quasi-experimental research (quasi-experimental). The population is all students of class VIII MTs BIMA, the sample of this research is 36 students of class VIII-A and 36 students of class VIII-B. Data analysis was performed by t-test. These findings indicate that: (1) student learning outcomes using the Think Pair And Share learning model are better with an average score of 84,848 than student learning outcomes using the Decision Making model with an average score of 79.88. (2) There is a significant difference in student learning outcomes with the Think Pair And Share and Decision Making learning models on the subject matter of the human movement system in class VIII MTs BIMA for the 2020/2021 school year. This is in accordance with the t-test calculation, that based on the calculation results obtained tcount = 2.39 this result is compared with ttable at the real level = 0.05, t table = 1.67 then t count > t table = 2.39 > 1.67. The conclusion of this study explains that there are significant differences in student learning outcomes using the Think Pair And Share and Decision Making learning models on the subject matter of the human movement system in class VIII MTs BIMA in the 2020/2021 school year.","PeriodicalId":413626,"journal":{"name":"PENDALAS: Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Pengabdian Masyarakat","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PENDALAS: Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Pengabdian Masyarakat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47006/pendalas.v2i2.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in student learning outcomes using the Think Pair And Share and Decision Making learning models on the subject matter of the Human Movement System in class VIII MTs BIMA in the 2020/2021 academic year. This research is a quantitative research, with the type of quasi-experimental research (quasi-experimental). The population is all students of class VIII MTs BIMA, the sample of this research is 36 students of class VIII-A and 36 students of class VIII-B. Data analysis was performed by t-test. These findings indicate that: (1) student learning outcomes using the Think Pair And Share learning model are better with an average score of 84,848 than student learning outcomes using the Decision Making model with an average score of 79.88. (2) There is a significant difference in student learning outcomes with the Think Pair And Share and Decision Making learning models on the subject matter of the human movement system in class VIII MTs BIMA for the 2020/2021 school year. This is in accordance with the t-test calculation, that based on the calculation results obtained tcount = 2.39 this result is compared with ttable at the real level = 0.05, t table = 1.67 then t count > t table = 2.39 > 1.67. The conclusion of this study explains that there are significant differences in student learning outcomes using the Think Pair And Share and Decision Making learning models on the subject matter of the human movement system in class VIII MTs BIMA in the 2020/2021 school year.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生差异和学习活动的结果,使用思维配对和分享模式和决策制造
本研究旨在确定在2020/2021学年,在BIMA八年级人体运动系统的主题上,使用思维配对、分享和决策学习模型来确定学生学习成果的差异。本研究属于定量研究,具有准实验研究(quasi-experimental)的类型。总体为所有MTs BIMA VIII班学生,本研究样本为36名VIII- a班学生和36名VIII- b班学生。数据分析采用t检验。研究结果表明:(1)使用Think Pair和Share学习模式的学生学习成果平均得分为84,848分,优于使用Decision Making学习模式的学生学习成果平均得分79.88分。(2) 2020/2021学年,BIMA八班在人体运动系统主题方面,采用思维配对、分享和决策学习模式的学生学习效果存在显著差异。这是按照t检验计算得出的,即根据计算得到的结果tcount = 2.39将此结果与表在真实水平= 0.05时进行比较,ttable = 1.67则tcount > ttable = 2.39 > 1.67。本研究的结论解释了在2020/2021学年,在BIMA八班的人体运动系统主题上,使用Think Pair和Share和Decision Making学习模型的学生学习结果存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MENERAPKAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP PENGEMBANGAN KURIKULUM PAI DI SMP NEGERI LIMA PULUH MEDIA INSTAGRAM SEBAGAI AJANG EKSISTENSI DIRI (Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara) MAKNA KELUARGA BATAK PADA FILM NGERI-NGERI SEDAP ANALISIS PERENCANAAN ANGGARAN PENDAPATAN BELANJA PENDIDIKAN PEMBIAYAAN DAN PENINGKATAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1