THE DANGER OF THE PHENOMENON OF ″RASHISM″ BY SIGNS OF IMPACT ON SOCIAL AND CULTURAL LIFE: STATE AND LEGAL NATURE

O. Antonova
{"title":"THE DANGER OF THE PHENOMENON OF ″RASHISM″ BY SIGNS OF IMPACT ON SOCIAL AND CULTURAL LIFE: STATE AND LEGAL NATURE","authors":"O. Antonova","doi":"10.33251/2707-8620-2022-7-107-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The author of the article determined the state-legal nature of the danger of the phenomenon of ″rashism″ and made attempts to systematize the state-legal aspects of threats based on the effects on cultural and social life. It was established that the main factors of danger in social and cultural life are: inviolable anti-humanistic socio-cultural policy; there is no culture of international law; a developed policy of distorting real events; lack of culture of high-tech production; self-reliance due to nuclear weapons; socially dangerous orientation of the aggressor country. All these factors reveal the state-legal nature of the danger of the phenomenon of ″racism″ in terms of its impact on social and cultural life. Such a policy is oriented towards the neglect of human and children's rights; ignoring norms of international humanitarian law and basic constitutional principles; the growth of innovative parasitism; violation of international rules of nuclear and radiation safety; the development of policies aimed at socially dependent, low-culture people. All examples of ″rashism″ given in the article confirmed the existence of a powerful mechanism of state influence, which operates in two directions: against one's own people (in the country of the aggressor); against other nations (outside the aggressor country). Such a policy of Russia contradicts the ascending legal principles, universal human values and, accordingly, threatens the security of mankind. At the same time, if the aggressor state uses violence against its citizens, cultural figures do not react to it, or find all kinds of excuses for it. In the case of criminal acts against other peoples, cultural figures direct their efforts to support the misanthropic policy of their state. In this matter, the study of the national legislation of Ukraine through the prism of its provisions that make it possible to effectively fight against manifestations of fascism is promising. Elucidation of these issues will make it possible to distinguish responsibility for crimes characteristic of rashism. Key words: state, legal nature, security, fascism, rashism, human and citizen rights and freedoms, international humanitarian law, rule of law, war crimes, aggressor country, social and cultural life.","PeriodicalId":414547,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Bulletin of Flight Academy. Section: Economics, Management and Law","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Bulletin of Flight Academy. Section: Economics, Management and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33251/2707-8620-2022-7-107-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. The author of the article determined the state-legal nature of the danger of the phenomenon of ″rashism″ and made attempts to systematize the state-legal aspects of threats based on the effects on cultural and social life. It was established that the main factors of danger in social and cultural life are: inviolable anti-humanistic socio-cultural policy; there is no culture of international law; a developed policy of distorting real events; lack of culture of high-tech production; self-reliance due to nuclear weapons; socially dangerous orientation of the aggressor country. All these factors reveal the state-legal nature of the danger of the phenomenon of ″racism″ in terms of its impact on social and cultural life. Such a policy is oriented towards the neglect of human and children's rights; ignoring norms of international humanitarian law and basic constitutional principles; the growth of innovative parasitism; violation of international rules of nuclear and radiation safety; the development of policies aimed at socially dependent, low-culture people. All examples of ″rashism″ given in the article confirmed the existence of a powerful mechanism of state influence, which operates in two directions: against one's own people (in the country of the aggressor); against other nations (outside the aggressor country). Such a policy of Russia contradicts the ascending legal principles, universal human values and, accordingly, threatens the security of mankind. At the same time, if the aggressor state uses violence against its citizens, cultural figures do not react to it, or find all kinds of excuses for it. In the case of criminal acts against other peoples, cultural figures direct their efforts to support the misanthropic policy of their state. In this matter, the study of the national legislation of Ukraine through the prism of its provisions that make it possible to effectively fight against manifestations of fascism is promising. Elucidation of these issues will make it possible to distinguish responsibility for crimes characteristic of rashism. Key words: state, legal nature, security, fascism, rashism, human and citizen rights and freedoms, international humanitarian law, rule of law, war crimes, aggressor country, social and cultural life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危险现象″拉什主义″通过迹象对社会文化生活的影响:国家和法律性质
摘要这篇文章的作者确定了″拉什主义″现象危险的国家法律性质,并试图根据对文化和社会生活的影响将威胁的国家法律方面系统化。人们确定,社会和文化生活中的主要危险因素是:不可侵犯的反人道主义社会文化政策;没有国际法文化;歪曲真实事件的发达政策;高新技术生产文化缺失;核武器带来的自力更生;侵略国的社会危险倾向。从对社会文化生活的影响来看,所有这些因素都揭示了″种族主义″现象危险的国家法律性质。这种政策的目的是忽视人权和儿童权利;无视国际人道主义法准则和基本宪法原则;创新寄生的增长;违反核与辐射安全国际规则;针对社会依赖、文化水平低的人群制定政策。文中所列举的所有″拉什主义″的例子都证实了一种强大的国家影响机制的存在,这种机制在两个方向上起作用:反对自己的人民(在侵略者的国家);反对其他国家(在侵略国之外)。俄罗斯的这种政策违背了日益上升的法律原则和普遍的人类价值,因此威胁到人类的安全。与此同时,如果侵略国对其公民使用暴力,文化人物不会对此作出反应,或者为其找到各种借口。在针对其他民族的犯罪行为中,文化人物直接支持他们国家的反人类政策。在这个问题上,通过使乌克兰能够有效地同法西斯主义的表现作斗争的规定的棱镜来研究乌克兰的国家立法是有希望的。阐明这些问题将有助于区分具有轻率主义特征的犯罪的责任。关键词:国家、法律性质、安全、法西斯主义、拉什主义、人权和公民权利与自由、国际人道法、法治、战争罪、侵略国、社会和文化生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction of electric transport as a way to fight against pollution of the environment Improvement of motivational management technologies based on assessment of professional development and personnel competitiveness The need to assess the effectiveness of the implementation of budget programs in the field of education and science Information security in Ukraine: present state and development prospects Government financial control: problems and prospective areas of improvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1