It's Capitalism, Stupid!: The Theoretical and Political Limitations of the Concept of Neoliberalism

B. W. Sculos
{"title":"It's Capitalism, Stupid!: The Theoretical and Political Limitations of the Concept of Neoliberalism","authors":"B. W. Sculos","doi":"10.25148/crcp.7.2.008326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This polemical essay explores the meaning and function of the concept of neoliberalism, focusing on the serious theoretical and political limitations of the concept. The crux of the argument is that, for those interested in overcoming the exploitative and oppressively destructive elements of global capitalism, opposing \"neoliberalism\" (even if best understood as a process or a spectrum of \"neoliberalization\" or simply privatization) is both insufficient and potentially self-undermining. This article also goes into some detail on the issues of health care and climate change in relation to \"neoliberalism\" (both conceptually and the material processes and policies that this term refers to) to highlight the theoretical and political arguments made throughout the article.","PeriodicalId":415971,"journal":{"name":"Class, Race and Corporate Power","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Class, Race and Corporate Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25148/crcp.7.2.008326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This polemical essay explores the meaning and function of the concept of neoliberalism, focusing on the serious theoretical and political limitations of the concept. The crux of the argument is that, for those interested in overcoming the exploitative and oppressively destructive elements of global capitalism, opposing "neoliberalism" (even if best understood as a process or a spectrum of "neoliberalization" or simply privatization) is both insufficient and potentially self-undermining. This article also goes into some detail on the issues of health care and climate change in relation to "neoliberalism" (both conceptually and the material processes and policies that this term refers to) to highlight the theoretical and political arguments made throughout the article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这是资本主义,笨蛋!新自由主义概念的理论和政治局限性
这篇辩论性的文章探讨了新自由主义概念的意义和功能,重点是该概念在理论和政治上的严重局限性。争论的关键在于,对于那些有兴趣克服全球资本主义的剥削性和压迫性破坏性因素的人来说,反对“新自由主义”(即使最好被理解为“新自由主义化”的一个过程或范围,或者简单地理解为私有化)是不够的,而且可能会自我破坏。本文还详细介绍了与“新自由主义”相关的医疗保健和气候变化问题(包括概念和该术语所指的物质过程和政策),以突出整篇文章的理论和政治论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bell Pottinger: Pre-Digital Fake News During the Rise of Neoliberalism Keep It In The Ground! An Eco-Political Music Video Corporations, Associations and the State: The International Subsidy System for Film The End of Humanitarian Intervention? A Debate at the Oxford Union With Historian David Gibbs and Michael Chertoff Beyond a Mere Aesthetic Theory: a Review of Michael Feola’s The Power of Sensibility: Aesthetic Politics through Adorno, Foucault, and Ranciѐre (2018)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1