Automatic Classification and Analysis of Interdisciplinary Fields in Computer Sciences

Tanmoy Chakraborty, Srijan Kumar, M. Reddy, Suhansanu Kumar, Niloy Ganguly, Animesh Mukherjee
{"title":"Automatic Classification and Analysis of Interdisciplinary Fields in Computer Sciences","authors":"Tanmoy Chakraborty, Srijan Kumar, M. Reddy, Suhansanu Kumar, Niloy Ganguly, Animesh Mukherjee","doi":"10.1109/SocialCom.2013.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last two decades, there have been studies claiming that science is becoming ever more interdisciplinary. However, the evidence has been anecdotal or partial. Here for the first time, we investigate a large size citation network of computer science domain with the intention to develop an automated unsupervised classification model that can efficiently distinguish the core and the interdisciplinary research fields. For this purpose, we propose four indicative features, three of these are directly related to the topological structure of the citation network, while the fourth is an external indicator based on the attractiveness of a field for the in-coming researchers. The significance of each of these features in characterizing interdisciplinary is measured independently and then systematically accumulated to build an unsupervised classification model. The result of the classification model shows two distinctive clusters that clearly distinguish core and interdisciplinary fields of computer science domain. Based on this classification, we further study the evolution dynamics at a microscopic level to show how interdisciplinarity emerges through cross-fertilization of ideas between the fields that otherwise have little overlap as they are mostly studied independently. Finally, to understand the overall impact of interdisciplinary research on the entire domain, we analyze selective citation based measurements of core and interdisciplinary fields, paper submission and acceptance statistics at top-tier conferences and the core-periphery structure of citation network, and observe an increasing impact of the interdisciplinary fields along with their steady integration with the computer science core in recent times.","PeriodicalId":129308,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Social Computing","volume":"605 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Social Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2013.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

In the last two decades, there have been studies claiming that science is becoming ever more interdisciplinary. However, the evidence has been anecdotal or partial. Here for the first time, we investigate a large size citation network of computer science domain with the intention to develop an automated unsupervised classification model that can efficiently distinguish the core and the interdisciplinary research fields. For this purpose, we propose four indicative features, three of these are directly related to the topological structure of the citation network, while the fourth is an external indicator based on the attractiveness of a field for the in-coming researchers. The significance of each of these features in characterizing interdisciplinary is measured independently and then systematically accumulated to build an unsupervised classification model. The result of the classification model shows two distinctive clusters that clearly distinguish core and interdisciplinary fields of computer science domain. Based on this classification, we further study the evolution dynamics at a microscopic level to show how interdisciplinarity emerges through cross-fertilization of ideas between the fields that otherwise have little overlap as they are mostly studied independently. Finally, to understand the overall impact of interdisciplinary research on the entire domain, we analyze selective citation based measurements of core and interdisciplinary fields, paper submission and acceptance statistics at top-tier conferences and the core-periphery structure of citation network, and observe an increasing impact of the interdisciplinary fields along with their steady integration with the computer science core in recent times.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机科学跨学科领域的自动分类与分析
在过去的二十年里,有研究声称科学正变得越来越跨学科。然而,这些证据都是道听途说或片面的。本文首次对计算机科学领域的大型引文网络进行了研究,旨在开发一种能够有效区分核心研究领域和跨学科研究领域的自动无监督分类模型。为此,我们提出了四个指示性特征,其中三个特征与引文网络的拓扑结构直接相关,而第四个特征是基于一个领域对进入研究者的吸引力的外部指标。这些特征在跨学科特征中的重要性被独立地测量,然后系统地积累,以建立一个无监督分类模型。分类模型的结果显示了两个不同的集群,清楚地区分了计算机科学领域的核心领域和跨学科领域。基于这一分类,我们进一步研究了微观层面上的进化动态,以展示跨学科是如何通过领域之间的思想交叉受精而产生的,否则这些领域几乎没有重叠,因为它们大多是独立研究的。最后,为了了解跨学科研究对整个领域的整体影响,我们分析了基于核心和跨学科领域的选择性引文测量、顶级会议的论文提交和接受统计以及引文网络的核心-外围结构,并观察到近年来跨学科领域的影响力不断增强,并与计算机科学核心稳步融合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Novel Group Recommendation Algorithm with Collaborative Filtering Access Control Policy Extraction from Unconstrained Natural Language Text Stock Market Manipulation Using Cyberattacks Together with Misinformation Disseminated through Social Media Friendship Prediction on Social Network Users An Empirical Comparison of Graph Databases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1