Assessing Trustworthiness

B. Shneiderman
{"title":"Assessing Trustworthiness","authors":"B. Shneiderman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192845290.003.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measuring the more than thirty attributes of HCAI systems, like reliability, safety, and trustworthiness is very difficult. Objective measures seem unlikely, but subjective impressions from stakeholders such as researchers, developers, managers, and users may help to clarify whether the trustworthiness is increased or decreased after changes have been made, or to compare two competing products, such as is done by winetasting. The HCAI Trustworthiness Assessment Process suggests a way of developing a subjective evaluation scale. The proposed twelve-item HCAI Trustworthiness Scale relies on questions about whether a system has an audit trail, has passed software and fairness tests, and includes explainable user interfaces. It also has questions about internal and external review processes.","PeriodicalId":159193,"journal":{"name":"Human-Centered AI","volume":"16 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human-Centered AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845290.003.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Measuring the more than thirty attributes of HCAI systems, like reliability, safety, and trustworthiness is very difficult. Objective measures seem unlikely, but subjective impressions from stakeholders such as researchers, developers, managers, and users may help to clarify whether the trustworthiness is increased or decreased after changes have been made, or to compare two competing products, such as is done by winetasting. The HCAI Trustworthiness Assessment Process suggests a way of developing a subjective evaluation scale. The proposed twelve-item HCAI Trustworthiness Scale relies on questions about whether a system has an audit trail, has passed software and fairness tests, and includes explainable user interfaces. It also has questions about internal and external review processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估可信度
衡量HCAI系统的30多个属性,如可靠性、安全性和可信度是非常困难的。客观测量似乎不太可能,但来自利益相关者(如研究人员、开发人员、管理人员和用户)的主观印象可能有助于澄清在做出更改后可信度是增加还是减少,或者比较两个竞争产品,例如通过品酒所做的。HCAI可信度评估过程提出了一种开发主观评价量表的方法。拟议的12项HCAI可信度量表依赖于系统是否有审计跟踪,是否通过了软件和公平性测试,是否包括可解释的用户界面。它还对内部和外部审查程序提出了疑问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Do Rationalism and Empiricism Provide Sound Foundations? Introduction: Driving HCAI Forward Summary and Skeptic’s Corner Defining Reliable, Safe, and Trustworthy Systems Teammates and Tele-bots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1