Perceptions and practices: A survey of professional engineers and architects

D. Cunningham, J. Stewart
{"title":"Perceptions and practices: A survey of professional engineers and architects","authors":"D. Cunningham, J. Stewart","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This descriptive cross-sectional research study examines perceptions of time spent by architects and professional engineers on reading, writing, and evaluating various information products, as well as their perspectives of specific quality characteristics and the relative significance in meeting work goals. Professional engineers and architects were surveyed at seminars held at eight locations in seven states. Descriptive statistics were then used to investigate perceptions and relationships. Findings indicate architects and professional engineers spend the most amount of time reading correspondence and the least amount of time reading management reports. Respondents considered correspondence to be the most important reading activity. Participants also spend the most amount of time writing correspondence, closely followed by nearly equal time spent writing and editing technical reports and proposals. Finally, participants rated organization, comprehensiveness, and accuracy as the most important aspects while indicating mechanical issues such as grammar and spelling as the least important aspects of technical documents.","PeriodicalId":404833,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This descriptive cross-sectional research study examines perceptions of time spent by architects and professional engineers on reading, writing, and evaluating various information products, as well as their perspectives of specific quality characteristics and the relative significance in meeting work goals. Professional engineers and architects were surveyed at seminars held at eight locations in seven states. Descriptive statistics were then used to investigate perceptions and relationships. Findings indicate architects and professional engineers spend the most amount of time reading correspondence and the least amount of time reading management reports. Respondents considered correspondence to be the most important reading activity. Participants also spend the most amount of time writing correspondence, closely followed by nearly equal time spent writing and editing technical reports and proposals. Finally, participants rated organization, comprehensiveness, and accuracy as the most important aspects while indicating mechanical issues such as grammar and spelling as the least important aspects of technical documents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
观念和实践:对专业工程师和建筑师的调查
这个描述性的横断面研究考察了建筑师和专业工程师在阅读、写作和评估各种信息产品上所花费的时间,以及他们对特定质量特征和满足工作目标的相对重要性的看法。在七个州的八个地点举行的研讨会上,对专业工程师和建筑师进行了调查。然后使用描述性统计来调查感知和关系。研究结果表明,建筑师和专业工程师花在阅读信件上的时间最多,而花在阅读管理报告上的时间最少。受访者认为通信是最重要的阅读活动。参与者还花最多的时间写信件,紧随其后的是几乎相同的时间写和编辑技术报告和提案。最后,参与者认为组织、全面性和准确性是最重要的方面,而语法和拼写等机械问题是技术文档中最不重要的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Granola-eating, Birkenstock-wearing tree-huggers who want to take your guns: Reframing the rhetoric of sustainable agriculture Mobile ICT literacy: A contributor for environmental sustainability The systematic literature review as a research genre Analyzing the interplay between visual-verbal rhetorical strategies in multimodal documents Informal communication, sustainability, and the public writing work of organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1