Depicted welfare-recipient stereotypes in Norway and Denmark: a photo-elicitation study

Sofie Dencker-Larsen, K. Lundberg
{"title":"Depicted welfare-recipient stereotypes in Norway and Denmark: a photo-elicitation study","authors":"Sofie Dencker-Larsen, K. Lundberg","doi":"10.15845/NJSR.V7I0.866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welfare recipients are continuously subjected to media debates and governmental campaigns drawing on images and symbols encouraging improved work ethic and individual responsibility. Only few studies, however, have analysed how welfare recipients as ‘othered’ citizens react to these often stereotypical symbols and images targeting them. In this study we have investigated how welfare recipients in Norway and Denmark, and caseworkers in Denmark, understand and account for images which, through the use of stereotypes, directly or indirectly may question welfare recipients’ work ethic and deservedness. Analysing photo-elicitation interview data, we have uncovered a variety of reactions characterized by ‘problematization’. The interviewees problematize the image and depicted stereotypes, which they link both with motif and symbols and with surrounding public debates on the work ethic and deservedness of welfare recipients. Furthermore, as photo-elicitation is a rarely used tool in welfare research, we address methodological aspects of using photo-elicitation in a study of ‘othered’ welfare recipients.","PeriodicalId":207067,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Social Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15845/NJSR.V7I0.866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Welfare recipients are continuously subjected to media debates and governmental campaigns drawing on images and symbols encouraging improved work ethic and individual responsibility. Only few studies, however, have analysed how welfare recipients as ‘othered’ citizens react to these often stereotypical symbols and images targeting them. In this study we have investigated how welfare recipients in Norway and Denmark, and caseworkers in Denmark, understand and account for images which, through the use of stereotypes, directly or indirectly may question welfare recipients’ work ethic and deservedness. Analysing photo-elicitation interview data, we have uncovered a variety of reactions characterized by ‘problematization’. The interviewees problematize the image and depicted stereotypes, which they link both with motif and symbols and with surrounding public debates on the work ethic and deservedness of welfare recipients. Furthermore, as photo-elicitation is a rarely used tool in welfare research, we address methodological aspects of using photo-elicitation in a study of ‘othered’ welfare recipients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
描绘福利接受者在挪威和丹麦的刻板印象:一项图片启发研究
福利受惠者不断受到媒体辩论和政府宣传的影响,这些宣传的形象和象征鼓励改善职业道德和个人责任。然而,只有少数研究分析了作为“他者”的福利接受者对这些针对他们的通常是刻板印象的符号和形象的反应。在这项研究中,我们调查了挪威和丹麦的福利接受者,以及丹麦的社会工作者如何理解和解释通过使用刻板印象,直接或间接地质疑福利接受者的职业道德和应得的形象。通过分析照片引出式访谈数据,我们发现了以“问题化”为特征的各种反应。受访者对形象提出了问题,并描绘了刻板印象,他们将其与主题和符号以及围绕福利接受者的职业道德和应得性的公开辩论联系起来。此外,由于照片启发是福利研究中很少使用的工具,我们解决了在“其他”福利接受者研究中使用照片启发的方法问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disembodied care: Articulations of care in municipal policy regarding welfare technologies in eldercare Disembodied care: Articulations of care in municipal policy regarding welfare technologies in eldercare Economic composition and income volatility of Norwegian low-income families – a mixed method study of its implications How children’s navigation on digital platforms challenges child welfare assessments The complexity of multiple trauma understandings across disciplines – the COVID-19 pandemic as a ‘case’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1