Evaluating the Expressiveness of Domain Specific Modeling Languages Using the Bunge-Wand-Weber Ontology

J. Becker, Philipp Bergener, Dominic Breuker, M. Räckers
{"title":"Evaluating the Expressiveness of Domain Specific Modeling Languages Using the Bunge-Wand-Weber Ontology","authors":"J. Becker, Philipp Bergener, Dominic Breuker, M. Räckers","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2010.190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business Process Management is becoming an ever more important aspect for organizations alongside with Business Process Diagrams as a tool to describe business processes. So far process modeling has been mainly performed with generic process modeling languages. These approaches have however limitations when it comes to the needs of specific problem domains or automated process analysis. Semantic building block based languages (SBBL) aim to overcome those limitations by integrating domain semantics in the modeling language. However, this class of languages is only useful if they exhibit the same expressiveness as generic languages. In this paper we strive to answer this question by comparing the expressiveness of the SBBL language PICTURE with ARIS as a generic language based on the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontology, showing that PICTURE has hardly construct deficits compared to ARIS while showing less construct redundancy and construct overload in its constructs.","PeriodicalId":328811,"journal":{"name":"2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Business Process Management is becoming an ever more important aspect for organizations alongside with Business Process Diagrams as a tool to describe business processes. So far process modeling has been mainly performed with generic process modeling languages. These approaches have however limitations when it comes to the needs of specific problem domains or automated process analysis. Semantic building block based languages (SBBL) aim to overcome those limitations by integrating domain semantics in the modeling language. However, this class of languages is only useful if they exhibit the same expressiveness as generic languages. In this paper we strive to answer this question by comparing the expressiveness of the SBBL language PICTURE with ARIS as a generic language based on the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontology, showing that PICTURE has hardly construct deficits compared to ARIS while showing less construct redundancy and construct overload in its constructs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用Bunge-Wand-Weber本体评价领域特定建模语言的可表达性
对于组织来说,业务流程管理与作为描述业务流程的工具的业务流程图一样,正在成为一个越来越重要的方面。到目前为止,流程建模主要是用通用流程建模语言进行的。然而,当涉及到特定问题域或自动化过程分析的需求时,这些方法具有局限性。基于语义构建块的语言(SBBL)旨在通过在建模语言中集成领域语义来克服这些限制。然而,这类语言只有在表现出与泛型语言相同的表达能力时才有用。本文通过比较SBBL语言PICTURE与ARIS作为一种基于Bunge-Wand-Weber本体的通用语言的表达能力,试图回答这个问题,结果表明,与ARIS相比,PICTURE几乎没有结构缺陷,但其结构中却表现出较少的结构冗余和结构过载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
mHealth for Influenza Pandemic Surveillance in Developing Countries Unpacking the Dynamics of IS User Improvisation: A Research Framework Complex Software Systems in Legacy and Modern Environments: A Case Study of the PicklingTools Library Lessons from the Development of SSEUS: A System for Entry and Management of Peer-Reviewed Data Sequencing the Development Order of Architecture Products: An Application to DoDAF
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1