A Critical Appraisal of the Method of Revocation in the Nigerian Land Use Act and Government’s Compliance

E. Emudainohwo
{"title":"A Critical Appraisal of the Method of Revocation in the Nigerian Land Use Act and Government’s Compliance","authors":"E. Emudainohwo","doi":"10.4236/blr.2021.123039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Critical Appraisal of the Method of Revocation in the Nigerian Land Use \nAct and Government’s Compliance \nThe paper inquires whether there is government’s compliance with the method of revocation of right of occupancy stipulated in the Land Use Act (LUA) (1978). The LUA has prescribed the procedure for the revocation of right of occupancy. It is expected that government complies with the procedure. There have been cases where government did follow laid down procedure for the revocation of right occupancy. Therefore, when government flouts laws regulating the procedure for the acquisition of private property, it is the obligation of the Nigerian courts to intervene in favour of the private citizen. Though the courts are obliged to intervene, the question is: what happens, when government disobeys court orders? Or what happens when private citizens for lack of means did not challenge in court any wrong procedure adopted by government? Apart from calling for more judicial activism in this area, the paper argued that government should follow laid down procedure for the acquisition of private property; for even God who has laid down the procedure for man to be holy has also subjected himself to holiness.","PeriodicalId":300394,"journal":{"name":"Beijing Law Review","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beijing Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2021.123039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A Critical Appraisal of the Method of Revocation in the Nigerian Land Use Act and Government’s Compliance The paper inquires whether there is government’s compliance with the method of revocation of right of occupancy stipulated in the Land Use Act (LUA) (1978). The LUA has prescribed the procedure for the revocation of right of occupancy. It is expected that government complies with the procedure. There have been cases where government did follow laid down procedure for the revocation of right occupancy. Therefore, when government flouts laws regulating the procedure for the acquisition of private property, it is the obligation of the Nigerian courts to intervene in favour of the private citizen. Though the courts are obliged to intervene, the question is: what happens, when government disobeys court orders? Or what happens when private citizens for lack of means did not challenge in court any wrong procedure adopted by government? Apart from calling for more judicial activism in this area, the paper argued that government should follow laid down procedure for the acquisition of private property; for even God who has laid down the procedure for man to be holy has also subjected himself to holiness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚《土地使用法》中撤销方法的批判性评价与政府合规
对尼日利亚《土地使用法》中占用权撤销方式的批判性评价与政府的合规性本文探讨了政府是否遵守了1978年《土地使用法》中规定的占用权撤销方式。《住房法》规定了撤销占用权的程序。希望政府遵守程序。在某些情况下,政府确实遵循了撤销权利占用的规定程序。因此,当政府藐视规定取得私有财产程序的法律时,尼日利亚法院有义务进行干预,以支持普通公民。虽然法院有义务进行干预,但问题是:当政府不服从法院命令时会发生什么?或者,当普通公民因经济拮据而不在法庭上挑战政府采取的任何错误程序时,又会发生什么?除了呼吁在这一领域采取更多的司法能动主义外,本文还认为政府应该遵循既定的程序来获取私有财产;因为神既定了叫人成圣的程序,也使自己成为圣洁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of Law in Wildlife Management The Incredible Shrinking Fourth Amendment —The Ongoing Erosion of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America The Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research: Ethics Guardians or Keystone Cops? Research on the Development Direction of International Commercial Arbitration Network Institutionalizing Social Norms and Legal Culture: Social Dynamics under Legal Awareness Policy in Contemporary China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1