An audit of healthcare workers' knowledge of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) against current infection control standards

D. Trigg, S. Timmons, C. Pynegar
{"title":"An audit of healthcare workers' knowledge of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) against current infection control standards","authors":"D. Trigg, S. Timmons, C. Pynegar","doi":"10.1177/1469044607084970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this audit was to establish the knowledge of different healthcare workers regarding meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection control precautions within the clinical environment. Data was interpreted to identify how education could be appropriately targeted to enhance the knowledge of all staff. A cross-sectional audit tool was developed from existing policies and national guidelines. Stratified random sampling was undertaken and 961 audits were distributed proportionately to differing groups of healthcare workers from within one UK NHS hospital; 411 audits were returned giving a 43% response rate. The majority of staff (71%) felt that MRSA is a very serious issue. The amount of staff that had read the trust's MRSA policy or received any formal MRSA education varied considerably, depending on the healthcare worker's occupation, and it was predominantly the nursing staff who had read the MRSA policy. It was unexpected, but encouraging, to find that unregistered nurses (healthcare assistants) and doctors had received the most education regarding MRSA. Of concern was that the majority of hotel services staff (69%) had not read the policy or received any MRSA education (79%). Only medical staff felt they had received adequate amounts of education on MRSA.","PeriodicalId":265443,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Infection Control","volume":"172 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1469044607084970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The aim of this audit was to establish the knowledge of different healthcare workers regarding meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection control precautions within the clinical environment. Data was interpreted to identify how education could be appropriately targeted to enhance the knowledge of all staff. A cross-sectional audit tool was developed from existing policies and national guidelines. Stratified random sampling was undertaken and 961 audits were distributed proportionately to differing groups of healthcare workers from within one UK NHS hospital; 411 audits were returned giving a 43% response rate. The majority of staff (71%) felt that MRSA is a very serious issue. The amount of staff that had read the trust's MRSA policy or received any formal MRSA education varied considerably, depending on the healthcare worker's occupation, and it was predominantly the nursing staff who had read the MRSA policy. It was unexpected, but encouraging, to find that unregistered nurses (healthcare assistants) and doctors had received the most education regarding MRSA. Of concern was that the majority of hotel services staff (69%) had not read the policy or received any MRSA education (79%). Only medical staff felt they had received adequate amounts of education on MRSA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对当前感染控制标准对医护人员耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)知识的审核
本次审核的目的是建立不同医护人员对临床环境中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染控制预防措施的了解。对数据进行了解释,以确定如何适当地有针对性地开展教育,以提高所有工作人员的知识。根据现有政策和国家准则制定了一项横断面审计工具。进行了分层随机抽样,并按比例将961次审计分配给来自英国国民保健制度医院的不同组的保健工作者;收到411份审计报告,回复率为43%。大多数员工(71%)认为MRSA是一个非常严重的问题。阅读过MRSA政策或接受过任何MRSA正规教育的员工数量差异很大,这取决于医护人员的职业,阅读过MRSA政策的主要是护理人员。出乎意料,但令人鼓舞的是,发现未注册的护士(医疗助理)和医生接受了最多关于MRSA的教育。值得关注的是,大多数酒店服务人员(69%)没有阅读过该政策或接受过任何MRSA教育(79%)。只有医务人员认为他们接受了足够的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated care pathway for Clostridium difficile helps patient management The First European Union Antibiotic Awareness Day: raising awareness to protect the future Single room isolation to prevent the transmission of infection: development of a patient journey tool to support safe practice Essential Steps to Safe, Clean Care: The process of managing change Determinants of appropriate antibiotic use in the community — a survey in Sydney and Hong Kong
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1