Legal Protection Implications on Trademark in Indonesia by Comparing the First to Use and First to File Principles

Prisca Oktaviani Samosir, Aida Mustafa
{"title":"Legal Protection Implications on Trademark in Indonesia by Comparing the First to Use and First to File Principles","authors":"Prisca Oktaviani Samosir, Aida Mustafa","doi":"10.2991/aebmr.k.200226.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trademark is intangible goods. In the trademark, inherent value is an intangible asset for the owner because the trademark gives ownership rights as the legal subject, namely individuals (natural persoon) or legal entities (recht persoon), so that trademarks become intangible assets. Because the trademark has value, it is appropriate for trademark owners to get legal protection. Legal protection for trademark in Indonesia is only given to trademark owners who register their trademarks for the first time, in the principle, first to file. Currently, Indonesia does not use the principle of first to use, where the first trademark user has protection against the trademark. The application of these two principles has a difference to the implications for legal protection provided specifically on company-owned trademarks. This paper will discuss the differences in the implications of legal protection for company trademarks in Indonesia by comparing the principles of first to use and the principle of first to file. This paper used normative method with an economic analysis of law approach. The results showed that the principle of first to file in trademark registration more fulfilled the principles of rational choice, efficiency, value and utility compared to the principle of first to use.","PeriodicalId":300116,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2019)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200226.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trademark is intangible goods. In the trademark, inherent value is an intangible asset for the owner because the trademark gives ownership rights as the legal subject, namely individuals (natural persoon) or legal entities (recht persoon), so that trademarks become intangible assets. Because the trademark has value, it is appropriate for trademark owners to get legal protection. Legal protection for trademark in Indonesia is only given to trademark owners who register their trademarks for the first time, in the principle, first to file. Currently, Indonesia does not use the principle of first to use, where the first trademark user has protection against the trademark. The application of these two principles has a difference to the implications for legal protection provided specifically on company-owned trademarks. This paper will discuss the differences in the implications of legal protection for company trademarks in Indonesia by comparing the principles of first to use and the principle of first to file. This paper used normative method with an economic analysis of law approach. The results showed that the principle of first to file in trademark registration more fulfilled the principles of rational choice, efficiency, value and utility compared to the principle of first to use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较先使用原则和先申请原则对印尼商标法律保护的影响
商标是无形的商品。在商标中,固有价值对于商标所有人来说是一种无形资产,因为商标赋予所有权的法律主体,即个人(自然人)或法人(自然人),从而使商标成为无形资产。由于商标具有价值,商标所有人理应得到法律保护。在印度尼西亚,商标的法律保护只给予首次注册商标的商标所有人,原则上是先申请。目前,印度尼西亚并没有采用先用原则,即第一商标使用者对商标享有保护。这两项原则的适用不同于对公司自有商标提供法律保护的含义。本文将通过比较先使用原则和先申请原则来讨论印度尼西亚公司商标法律保护含义的差异。本文采用了规范性研究方法和法律经济分析方法。结果表明,在商标注册中,优先申请原则比优先使用原则更符合理性选择原则、效率原则、价值原则和效用原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Realization of Maqoshid Shari’ah as Local Values in Industrial Relations Disputes Resolution Efforts The Relationship Between Human Basic (Human Rights) Obligations and Human Rights Identity Theft and the Rules in Indonesia’s Criminal Law Constitutional Court as the Guard of Enforcement Constitution: Is It Challenging? Detention of Terrorism Suspects in the Perspective of Equality Before the Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1