Rational approach, technique and selection criteria for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with Regenerative Selective Disc therapy

C. Buscemi, A. Licata
{"title":"Rational approach, technique and selection criteria for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with Regenerative Selective Disc therapy","authors":"C. Buscemi, A. Licata","doi":"10.4081/ozone.2019.8378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low back pain is one of the most common and important clinical, social, economic, and public health problems affecting the human population worldwide. The mechanism of radicular pain in the lumbar region is multifactorial but is likely due to mechanical and/or inflammatory factors. The natural history of disc herniation tends to be favourable. The Italian Society for Oxygen-Ozone Therapy (SIOOT) and the Italian Society for Spinal Surgery (SICV) guidelines recommend a conservative therapeutic approach. The biological action of medical ozone is still under investigation but some mechanisms of action have been proposed to explain its efficacy in disc herniation treatment: i) reduction of the inflammatory components; ii) hyper-oxygenation of the area of interest; iii) diminishing the size of the herniation; iv) stimulation of the repair process. The primary objective of this pilot study was to compare pain and function scores from patients before and after the treatment with Regenerative Selective Disc. The metrics that were established to define significant improvement were: i) improvement >1.8 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score; ii) improvement of 1 level or more on the modified Macnab criteria; iii) improvement >15% on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Primary endpoints of this study were changes in the pretreatment and 1 month post treatment VAS, ODI and Macnab scores of the patients. After treatment results show that the patient population’s mean VAS, ODI and modified Macnab scores improved beyond the significant improvement scores. In fact, results showed that the mean patient’s population improvement scores were 2.9 for VAS, 22 for ODI and 1.4 for modified Macnab. Additionally, significant improvements were shown for 87% of the patients for VAS scale (>2.0), 80% of the patients for the ODI scale (>15 points) and 80% patients for the modified Macnab criteria (>1 point).","PeriodicalId":137514,"journal":{"name":"Ozone Therapy","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ozone Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ozone.2019.8378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low back pain is one of the most common and important clinical, social, economic, and public health problems affecting the human population worldwide. The mechanism of radicular pain in the lumbar region is multifactorial but is likely due to mechanical and/or inflammatory factors. The natural history of disc herniation tends to be favourable. The Italian Society for Oxygen-Ozone Therapy (SIOOT) and the Italian Society for Spinal Surgery (SICV) guidelines recommend a conservative therapeutic approach. The biological action of medical ozone is still under investigation but some mechanisms of action have been proposed to explain its efficacy in disc herniation treatment: i) reduction of the inflammatory components; ii) hyper-oxygenation of the area of interest; iii) diminishing the size of the herniation; iv) stimulation of the repair process. The primary objective of this pilot study was to compare pain and function scores from patients before and after the treatment with Regenerative Selective Disc. The metrics that were established to define significant improvement were: i) improvement >1.8 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score; ii) improvement of 1 level or more on the modified Macnab criteria; iii) improvement >15% on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Primary endpoints of this study were changes in the pretreatment and 1 month post treatment VAS, ODI and Macnab scores of the patients. After treatment results show that the patient population’s mean VAS, ODI and modified Macnab scores improved beyond the significant improvement scores. In fact, results showed that the mean patient’s population improvement scores were 2.9 for VAS, 22 for ODI and 1.4 for modified Macnab. Additionally, significant improvements were shown for 87% of the patients for VAS scale (>2.0), 80% of the patients for the ODI scale (>15 points) and 80% patients for the modified Macnab criteria (>1 point).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎间盘再生选择性治疗腰椎间盘突出症的合理入路、技术及选择标准
腰痛是影响全世界人口的最常见和最重要的临床、社会、经济和公共卫生问题之一。腰椎神经根性疼痛的机制是多因素的,但可能是由机械和/或炎症因素引起的。椎间盘突出的自然病史往往是有利的。意大利氧臭氧治疗学会(SIOOT)和意大利脊柱外科学会(SICV)指南推荐保守治疗方法。医用臭氧的生物作用仍在研究中,但已经提出了一些作用机制来解释其在椎间盘突出症治疗中的疗效:1)减少炎症成分;Ii)感兴趣区域的高氧合;Iii)缩小疝的大小;Iv)刺激修复过程。这项初步研究的主要目的是比较再生选择性椎间盘治疗前后患者的疼痛和功能评分。定义显著改善的指标为:i)视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分改善>1.8;ii)将修订后的Macnab标准提高一级或一级以上;iii) Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)改善>15%。本研究的主要终点是患者治疗前和治疗后1个月的VAS、ODI和Macnab评分的变化。治疗后结果显示,患者群体平均VAS、ODI和改良Macnab评分均改善超过显著改善评分。事实上,结果显示,患者的平均群体改善评分VAS为2.9,ODI为22,改良Macnab为1.4。此外,87%的VAS评分患者(>2.0)、80%的ODI评分患者(>15分)和80%的改良Macnab评分患者(>1分)均有显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anti-inflammatory effect of an eye drops solution based on liposomal ozonated oil in different corneal and anterior segment human diseases Treatment with oxygen-ozone therapy in hemodialysis patients Rational approach, technique and selection criteria for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation with Regenerative Selective Disc therapy Oxygen-ozone therapy: an extra weapon for the general practitioners and their patients Outpatient evaluation of oxidative stress in subjects undergoing systemic oxygen-ozone therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1