Der schmale Grat zwischen Realismus und Interpretation. Ein rekursiver Dialog zwischen „realistischem“ franko-belgischem Comic und Ethnographie

A. Müller
{"title":"Der schmale Grat zwischen Realismus und Interpretation. Ein rekursiver Dialog zwischen „realistischem“ franko-belgischem Comic und Ethnographie","authors":"A. Müller","doi":"10.31244/zekw/2022.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article questions and accounts for the collective management of “the relation to reality” among the amateurs – that is, the interpretative community of authors and readers – of so-called “realistic” Franco-Belgian Comics. My analysis aims at asking to what extent and in what ways this collective management, with its conventions and provisional agreements but also its tensions and controversies, can recursively inform ethnographic methods and theories as to their own collective management of “the relation to reality”. To do so, I examine how the narrative conventions of realistic Franco-Belgian Comics are rhetorically maintained through a tension between two dimensions, which are constantly negotiated among the amateurs of comics: a strong expectation that both the drawings and the storyline faithfully represent “reality” in giving a meticulous and meticulously documented account of “it” on one side, and an acceptance of the interpretative dimension inherent in creative and artistic representations on the other. Questioning the tradition of ethnographic realism in the recursive light of this analysis, I argue in conclusion that this tension pertains to an ontological misunderstanding, and plead for an articulation of ontological multiplicity, i.e., multiple relations to multiple realities, and for granting both fictional beings of comics and ethnographic beings their own modes of existence.","PeriodicalId":106373,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Empirische Kulturwissenschaft","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Empirische Kulturwissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31244/zekw/2022.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article questions and accounts for the collective management of “the relation to reality” among the amateurs – that is, the interpretative community of authors and readers – of so-called “realistic” Franco-Belgian Comics. My analysis aims at asking to what extent and in what ways this collective management, with its conventions and provisional agreements but also its tensions and controversies, can recursively inform ethnographic methods and theories as to their own collective management of “the relation to reality”. To do so, I examine how the narrative conventions of realistic Franco-Belgian Comics are rhetorically maintained through a tension between two dimensions, which are constantly negotiated among the amateurs of comics: a strong expectation that both the drawings and the storyline faithfully represent “reality” in giving a meticulous and meticulously documented account of “it” on one side, and an acceptance of the interpretative dimension inherent in creative and artistic representations on the other. Questioning the tradition of ethnographic realism in the recursive light of this analysis, I argue in conclusion that this tension pertains to an ontological misunderstanding, and plead for an articulation of ontological multiplicity, i.e., multiple relations to multiple realities, and for granting both fictional beings of comics and ethnographic beings their own modes of existence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现实主义和解释的基本平衡。视频和现实的法语比音书
本文质疑并解释了所谓的“现实主义”法比漫画的业余爱好者(即作者和读者的解释性社区)对“与现实的关系”的集体管理。我的分析旨在询问,这种集体管理,连同它的惯例和临时协议,以及它的紧张和争议,在多大程度上和以何种方式,可以递归地为民族志方法和理论提供信息,使它们能够对“与现实的关系”进行集体管理。为了做到这一点,我研究了现实主义法比漫画的叙事惯例是如何通过两个维度之间的紧张来修辞地维持的,这是漫画爱好者之间不断协商的:一方面,强烈期望绘画和故事情节忠实地代表“现实”,对“现实”进行细致入细的记录,另一方面,接受创造性和艺术表现中固有的解释性维度。在这种分析的递归之光中质疑民族志现实主义的传统,我在结论中认为,这种紧张关系与本体论的误解有关,并呼吁对本体论的多样性进行阐述,即,对多种现实的多种关系,并赋予漫画中的虚构人物和民族志人物各自的存在模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gefühlte Natur und natürliche Gefühle. Wie die ersten Planetarien urbane Natur produzierten und fühlbar machten ‚Position beziehen‘, ‚Haltung zeigen‘?! Bedingung und Problem kulturwissenschaftlicher Forschung“. Institut für Kulturanthropologie und Europäische Ethnologie an der Universität Freiburg im Breisgau, 15.–17. Juli 2022 Reenactment in the GDR and the FRG. An Actor-centered Study Zeit. Zur Temporalität von Kultur. 43. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Empirische Kulturwissenschaft (DGEKW) sowie des Lehrstuhls für Vergleichende Kulturwissenschaft an der Universität Regensburg, Online-Tagung (Regensburg), 4.–7. April 2022 Cou/rage! On Permanent Temporariness and the Precarization of Academia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1