White Feminism and Carceral Industries: Strange Bedfellows or Partners in Crime and Criminology?

A. Deslandes, Marlene Longbottom, Crystal Mckinnon, A. Porter
{"title":"White Feminism and Carceral Industries: Strange Bedfellows or Partners in Crime and Criminology?","authors":"A. Deslandes, Marlene Longbottom, Crystal Mckinnon, A. Porter","doi":"10.24135/dcj.v4i2.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we examine the existing policy and academic literature on punitive responses to gender-based and family violence, focusing, in particular, on women’s police stations. Specialist women’s police stations have been a feature of policing in Argentina, Brazil, and other South American as well as Central American countries since the late 1980s. They are considered to be a phenomenon of ‘the global South’, having also been set up in some African and Asian countries including Sierra Leone and India. In this article, we critique research on women’s police stations as well as the public discourse within which women’s police stations are being proposed as a solution to domestic violence – looking at questions of research design, methodology, empiricism, ethics, and criminological claims to knowledge or ‘truth’. We reflect on the significant dangers posed by the potential transfer of women’s police stations to the Australian context, especially for sovereign Indigenous women and girls. Finally, we critique what we see as deep-seated contradictions and anomalies inherent in ‘southern theory’ and white feminist carceralism.","PeriodicalId":136185,"journal":{"name":"Decolonization of Criminology and Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decolonization of Criminology and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24135/dcj.v4i2.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article, we examine the existing policy and academic literature on punitive responses to gender-based and family violence, focusing, in particular, on women’s police stations. Specialist women’s police stations have been a feature of policing in Argentina, Brazil, and other South American as well as Central American countries since the late 1980s. They are considered to be a phenomenon of ‘the global South’, having also been set up in some African and Asian countries including Sierra Leone and India. In this article, we critique research on women’s police stations as well as the public discourse within which women’s police stations are being proposed as a solution to domestic violence – looking at questions of research design, methodology, empiricism, ethics, and criminological claims to knowledge or ‘truth’. We reflect on the significant dangers posed by the potential transfer of women’s police stations to the Australian context, especially for sovereign Indigenous women and girls. Finally, we critique what we see as deep-seated contradictions and anomalies inherent in ‘southern theory’ and white feminist carceralism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白人女权主义和工业:犯罪和犯罪学中的奇怪同床异梦还是伙伴?
在本文中,我们研究了针对基于性别的暴力和家庭暴力的惩罚性反应的现有政策和学术文献,特别关注妇女警察局。自20世纪80年代末以来,专门的女性警察局一直是阿根廷、巴西和其他南美和中美洲国家警务工作的一个特色。它们被认为是“全球南方”的一种现象,在一些非洲和亚洲国家,包括塞拉利昂和印度,也设立了它们。在这篇文章中,我们批判了关于女性警察局的研究,以及将女性警察局作为家庭暴力解决方案的公共话语——着眼于研究设计、方法、经验主义、伦理和犯罪学对知识或“真相”的主张。我们考虑到可能将妇女警察局转移到澳大利亚,特别是对主权土著妇女和女孩造成的重大危险。最后,我们对“南方理论”和白人女权主义中固有的根深蒂固的矛盾和异常现象进行了批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Zealand’s Coalition Government Gang Policy and the Death of Evidence Editorial 6(1) Australia’s Regime of Bikie Legislation The Whakapapa of the ‘Patch’: He Korowai Tēnei Racial Profiling, Australian Criminology and the Creation of Statistical ‘Facts’: A Response to Shepherd and Spivak
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1