Mothers and the Labour Market

J. Brannen
{"title":"Mothers and the Labour Market","authors":"J. Brannen","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvs1g949.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reflects on the shifting public discourses in Britain concerning mothers and the labour market from the end of the Second World War and shows how the framing of research questions reflects these changing public discourses. At the end of the Second World War, women were ejected from many of the jobs in which they had worked in wartime to create work for returning servicemen. This ejection marked a watershed in women's lives and a backward step in female emancipation. The author began research on mothers in the labour market in the late 1970s. At that time, home was still promoted as the ‘best place’ to rear young children and mothers the best people to do so. This narrative shifted in the late 1980s, reflecting not only the rapid growth in the employment of mothers with young children but the increased emphasis placed by government on market forces and the notion of ‘individual choice’. Reflecting these changes, the social research agenda also shifted. In the 1960s and 1970s, motherhood was a small field of inquiry occupied mainly by those concerned with family life or child development. Gradually, much of the territory of ‘family studies’ was taken over by feminist sociologists whose work threw the spotlight on to patriarchy and women's oppression.","PeriodicalId":315116,"journal":{"name":"Social Research Matters","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Research Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvs1g949.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter reflects on the shifting public discourses in Britain concerning mothers and the labour market from the end of the Second World War and shows how the framing of research questions reflects these changing public discourses. At the end of the Second World War, women were ejected from many of the jobs in which they had worked in wartime to create work for returning servicemen. This ejection marked a watershed in women's lives and a backward step in female emancipation. The author began research on mothers in the labour market in the late 1970s. At that time, home was still promoted as the ‘best place’ to rear young children and mothers the best people to do so. This narrative shifted in the late 1980s, reflecting not only the rapid growth in the employment of mothers with young children but the increased emphasis placed by government on market forces and the notion of ‘individual choice’. Reflecting these changes, the social research agenda also shifted. In the 1960s and 1970s, motherhood was a small field of inquiry occupied mainly by those concerned with family life or child development. Gradually, much of the territory of ‘family studies’ was taken over by feminist sociologists whose work threw the spotlight on to patriarchy and women's oppression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母亲和劳动力市场
本章反映了从第二次世界大战结束以来,英国关于母亲和劳动力市场的公共话语的变化,并展示了研究问题的框架如何反映这些变化的公共话语。在第二次世界大战结束时,妇女被驱逐出她们在战时从事的许多工作,为返回的军人创造工作。这次驱逐标志着妇女生活的分水岭和妇女解放的倒退。作者从20世纪70年代末开始研究劳动力市场上的母亲。那时,家仍然被认为是养育孩子的“最佳场所”,而母亲则是养育孩子的最佳人选。这种说法在20世纪80年代末发生了转变,这不仅反映了有年幼孩子的母亲就业人数的迅速增长,而且反映了政府对市场力量和“个人选择”概念的日益重视。由于这些变化,社会研究议程也发生了变化。在1960年代和1970年代,母性是一个很小的研究领域,主要由那些关心家庭生活或儿童发展的人所从事。逐渐地,“家庭研究”的大部分领域被女权主义社会学家接管,他们的工作将焦点放在父权制和女性压迫上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Generational Lens on Families and Fathers Children and Young People in Families Inside the Household Life Stories: Appendix
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1