[A comparison of systemic radiotherapy, chemotherapy or local radiotherapy in the treatment of extensive small-cell bronchial carcinoma. Results of a randomized series].

Radiobiologia, radiotherapia Pub Date : 1990-01-01
J Hüttner, H Grunau, K H Dallüge, N Wiener, C Quadt, K Merkle, A Lessel, K H Rotte, B Schmitz, H Kleinau
{"title":"[A comparison of systemic radiotherapy, chemotherapy or local radiotherapy in the treatment of extensive small-cell bronchial carcinoma. Results of a randomized series].","authors":"J Hüttner,&nbsp;H Grunau,&nbsp;K H Dallüge,&nbsp;N Wiener,&nbsp;C Quadt,&nbsp;K Merkle,&nbsp;A Lessel,&nbsp;K H Rotte,&nbsp;B Schmitz,&nbsp;H Kleinau","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Between 1982 and 1987 we carried out a prospective randomized study to compare the effectiveness of high-dose half-body irradiation (HBI) (A), intensive combined chemotherapy (B), and local or locoregional radiotherapy (C) in the therapy of extended small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). 99 patients with a histologically proved SCLC were assigned to the three therapeutic groups of series: A = 31 patients, B = 37 patients, C = 31 patients. The median survival period showed a statistically significant advantage (p less than 0.01) for the chemotherapy group (B = 46 weeks) versus the two radiotherapy groups (A = 19 weeks, C = 23 weeks). The survival after half a year, one year, and two years also gave a clear advantage for the chemotherapy group. No difference was found between the radiotherapy groups A and C. The high-dose HBI gave no improvement of the sad therapeutic situation for the extended SCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":76404,"journal":{"name":"Radiobiologia, radiotherapia","volume":"31 1","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiobiologia, radiotherapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Between 1982 and 1987 we carried out a prospective randomized study to compare the effectiveness of high-dose half-body irradiation (HBI) (A), intensive combined chemotherapy (B), and local or locoregional radiotherapy (C) in the therapy of extended small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). 99 patients with a histologically proved SCLC were assigned to the three therapeutic groups of series: A = 31 patients, B = 37 patients, C = 31 patients. The median survival period showed a statistically significant advantage (p less than 0.01) for the chemotherapy group (B = 46 weeks) versus the two radiotherapy groups (A = 19 weeks, C = 23 weeks). The survival after half a year, one year, and two years also gave a clear advantage for the chemotherapy group. No difference was found between the radiotherapy groups A and C. The high-dose HBI gave no improvement of the sad therapeutic situation for the extended SCLC.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全身放疗、化疗和局部放疗治疗广泛小细胞支气管癌的比较。随机序列的结果]。
1982年至1987年间,我们进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,比较高剂量半体照射(HBI) (a)、强化联合化疗(B)和局部或局部放疗(C)治疗扩展性小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的有效性。99例经组织学证实的SCLC患者被分为三个治疗组:a = 31例,B = 37例,C = 31例。化疗组(B = 46周)与放疗组(a = 19周,C = 23周)相比,中位生存期有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。化疗组的半年、一年和两年生存率也有明显优势。放疗组A和放疗组c之间无差异。大剂量HBI对延长的SCLC的治疗情况没有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Studies of the immunostimulating properties of lipopolysaccharides and dextran sulfate based on a model of radiogenic immunodepression]. [The results of hypofractionated irradiation in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma]. [The combined radio-chemotherapy of inoperable esophageal cancer]. [Indications for radiotherapy of rectal cancer]. [A retrospective study of the results of postoperative radiotherapy of hypernephroma].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1