Philosophical and methodological reflection of educational theory as a phenomenon of scientology

A. V. Korzhuev, Y. B. Ikrennikova, E. Nikitina, E. L. Ryazanova
{"title":"Philosophical and methodological reflection of educational theory as a phenomenon of scientology","authors":"A. V. Korzhuev, Y. B. Ikrennikova, E. Nikitina, E. L. Ryazanova","doi":"10.15293/2226-3365.1802.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction . The problem of the article is addressed to clarify the question of how the content of practical pedagogical knowledge accumulated by the society can be understood from the point of view of an epistemologically of generalizations and analogies, and the methods for carrying out the experiment and identifying experimental confirmation of an experted theory. As the nearest stage in the solution of these problems, the authors design correct theoretical constructs of a restricted nature which must include the following aspects: identifying weak research development of several segments of pedagogical reality, raising hypotheses about the possibility of describing them from the point of view of the positively valuable educational outcome for the learner and the ways of achieving it, finding the criteria for its evaluation and implementing them in a diagnostic format. Conclusions. The presented variant of polyaspect reflection of the results of educational research based on the theoretical scheme covers both retrospective and prospective reflective forms; it also shows all the procedures traditionally indicated by psychologists: stopping, removing, fixing, reviewing, objectifying; allows educational researchers to evaluate their investigations according to scientific norms which achieve a theoretical status. All the theses of the problematic format presented in the article are a possible field of application for beginning researchers.","PeriodicalId":226844,"journal":{"name":"Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1802.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction . The problem of the article is addressed to clarify the question of how the content of practical pedagogical knowledge accumulated by the society can be understood from the point of view of an epistemologically of generalizations and analogies, and the methods for carrying out the experiment and identifying experimental confirmation of an experted theory. As the nearest stage in the solution of these problems, the authors design correct theoretical constructs of a restricted nature which must include the following aspects: identifying weak research development of several segments of pedagogical reality, raising hypotheses about the possibility of describing them from the point of view of the positively valuable educational outcome for the learner and the ways of achieving it, finding the criteria for its evaluation and implementing them in a diagnostic format. Conclusions. The presented variant of polyaspect reflection of the results of educational research based on the theoretical scheme covers both retrospective and prospective reflective forms; it also shows all the procedures traditionally indicated by psychologists: stopping, removing, fixing, reviewing, objectifying; allows educational researchers to evaluate their investigations according to scientific norms which achieve a theoretical status. All the theses of the problematic format presented in the article are a possible field of application for beginning researchers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为山达基现象的教育理论的哲学与方法论反思
介绍。本文的问题是为了澄清如何从概括和类比的认识论的角度来理解社会积累的实践教学知识的内容,以及进行实验和确定专家理论的实验确认的方法。作为解决这些问题的最近阶段,作者设计了正确的限制性理论结构,必须包括以下几个方面:识别教学现实的几个部分的薄弱研究发展,提出关于从对学习者有积极价值的教育成果和实现它的方式的角度描述它们的可能性的假设,找到其评估标准并以诊断格式实施它们。结论。基于这一理论方案提出的教育研究成果多向反思的变体包括回顾性反思和前瞻性反思两种形式;它还展示了心理学家传统上指出的所有程序:停止、移除、修复、回顾、客观化;使教育研究者能够按照科学规范来评价自己的研究,从而达到理论的地位。文章中提出的所有问题格式的论文都是初学者可能应用的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing students’ professional competencies within an active educational environment Implementation of mentoring programs for gifted and talented children and youth (an international perspective) Digital learning resources: Enhancing efficiency within blended higher education The regularities of developing students’ legal culture within a university educational environment Developing legal culture of a personality in the knowledge society: Conceptual foundations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1