Antisialogogue Effect of Atropine Sulfate at Dosages of 0.25 Mg and 0.5 Mg Under General Anesthesia with Ketamin

Muhammad Ramadhan Hasibuan, A. Lubis, D. W. Wijaya
{"title":"Antisialogogue Effect of Atropine Sulfate at Dosages of 0.25 Mg and 0.5 Mg Under General Anesthesia with Ketamin","authors":"Muhammad Ramadhan Hasibuan, A. Lubis, D. W. Wijaya","doi":"10.47353/jsocmed.v1i3.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Excessive saliva production can becomes an airway problem in conditions of decreased consciousness where there is impaired swallowing function. It increases the risk of aspiration of saliva into the airways that can result in choking. The use of premedication drugs to reduce the incidence of drug-induced hypersalivation can be done as a prevention. The anticholinergic drug class is the drug of choice for the management of hypersalivation in general anesthesia patients who have been given ketamine and ether. Ketamine as a sedating agent will provide a side effect of hypersalivation, where hypersalivation can cause laryngospasm or aspiration, as a form of prevention, anticholinergic drugs such as atropine can be given. The aim of this research was to compare the effect of antisialagogue on the administration of atropine sulfate at a dose of 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg in intravenous general anesthesia patients without ETT with ketamine at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan and Putri Hijau Hospital Medan.\nMethod: This study used a double blind RCT design. A total of 60 patients with intravenous general anesthesia without ETT with ketamine (1-2 mg/kg BW) were divided into 2 groups of Atropine Sulfas doses (0.25 and 0.5 mg) then the total salivary volume of each patient was measured and analyzed.\nResults: There was a significant difference between the treatment groups of 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg in the volume of saliva that had been collected (P-value = 0.008).\nConclusion: There was a significant comparison between the use of 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg atropine in patients at Haji Adam Malik Hospital and Putri Hijau Hospital Medan.","PeriodicalId":370087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Society Medicine","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Society Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47353/jsocmed.v1i3.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Excessive saliva production can becomes an airway problem in conditions of decreased consciousness where there is impaired swallowing function. It increases the risk of aspiration of saliva into the airways that can result in choking. The use of premedication drugs to reduce the incidence of drug-induced hypersalivation can be done as a prevention. The anticholinergic drug class is the drug of choice for the management of hypersalivation in general anesthesia patients who have been given ketamine and ether. Ketamine as a sedating agent will provide a side effect of hypersalivation, where hypersalivation can cause laryngospasm or aspiration, as a form of prevention, anticholinergic drugs such as atropine can be given. The aim of this research was to compare the effect of antisialagogue on the administration of atropine sulfate at a dose of 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg in intravenous general anesthesia patients without ETT with ketamine at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan and Putri Hijau Hospital Medan. Method: This study used a double blind RCT design. A total of 60 patients with intravenous general anesthesia without ETT with ketamine (1-2 mg/kg BW) were divided into 2 groups of Atropine Sulfas doses (0.25 and 0.5 mg) then the total salivary volume of each patient was measured and analyzed. Results: There was a significant difference between the treatment groups of 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg in the volume of saliva that had been collected (P-value = 0.008). Conclusion: There was a significant comparison between the use of 0.25 mg and 0.5 mg atropine in patients at Haji Adam Malik Hospital and Putri Hijau Hospital Medan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硫酸阿托品0.25 Mg和0.5 Mg在氯胺酮全麻下的抗涎作用
在意识下降、吞咽功能受损的情况下,唾液分泌过多会成为气道问题。它会增加唾液吸入气道的风险,从而导致窒息。用药前使用药物来减少药物性唾液过多的发生率是可以预防的。抗胆碱能类药物是治疗给予氯胺酮和乙醚的全身麻醉患者唾液过多的首选药物。氯胺酮作为镇静剂会产生唾液分泌过多的副作用,唾液分泌过多会引起喉痉挛或误吸,作为预防的一种形式,可以使用抗胆碱能药物,如阿托品。本研究的目的是比较抗喉剂对棉兰Haji Adam Malik综合医院和Putri Hijau医院无氯胺酮ETT静脉全麻患者0.25 mg和0.5 mg硫酸阿托品给药的影响。方法:采用双盲随机对照试验设计。采用氯胺酮(1 ~ 2 mg/kg BW)静脉全麻非ETT患者60例,分为阿托品磺胺类药物剂量(0.25、0.5 mg) 2组,测定并分析各组患者的总唾液体积。结果:0.25 mg与0.5 mg处理组唾液采集量差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.008)。结论:棉兰Haji Adam Malik医院和Putri Hijau医院的患者使用0.25 mg和0.5 mg阿托品有显著性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between Coagulation Profile and Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio with Karnofsky Performance Status Scale In Brain Tumor Patients Correlation Between Depression Level and Red Blood Cell Distribution Width (RDW) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Patients Undergoing Regular Hemodialysis at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan Prognostic Value of Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE), Right Ventricular Fractional Area Changes (RV FAC) and Pulses Tissue Doppler S' Wave (PTD S') at 30 Days after Care of Acute Miocardial Infarction Patients in Haji Adam Malik Hospital Correlation of Fatty Liver Imaging on Abdominal CT-Scan with Dyslipidemia in Haji Adam Malik General Hospital in 2020 The Relationship Between Serum Apolipoprotein B Levels and Severity of Coronary Lesions Using The Syntax Score in Non-St Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1