Parcelling Out Municipal Administration And Power in Amsterdam 1880-1940

S. Couperus
{"title":"Parcelling Out Municipal Administration And Power in Amsterdam 1880-1940","authors":"S. Couperus","doi":"10.1179/jrl.2011.7.1-2.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In contemporary urban studies much attention is devoted to the emergence of new governance collusions. Various 'partnerships', 'clusters of organised interests' and 'interagency networks' have been identified as part of a transition from local government to urban governance since the 1980s. On a generic level this transition involves various processes grouped under headings such as local corporatism (in the 1980s), the displacement of politics (more recently), the delegation or transfer of politico-administrative tasks from codified (democratic) institutions, such as elected authorities or executive agencies, to new governance clusters transcending the jurisdiction of public and territorial confinements.1 What is generally lacking in these contemporary analyses is reference to recurrent patterns of these processes of displacement and delegation of administrative tasks in the modern history of urban governance. Corporatism or functional representation at the local level, for instance, have been studied mainly by political scientists in the slipstream of the neo-corporatist paradigm which emerged in the late 1970s and 1980s.2 However, as recent historical studies have pointed out, similar arrangements were present during the interwar period which had an impact at the local level as wel1.3","PeriodicalId":299529,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Regional and Local Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Regional and Local Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/jrl.2011.7.1-2.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contemporary urban studies much attention is devoted to the emergence of new governance collusions. Various 'partnerships', 'clusters of organised interests' and 'interagency networks' have been identified as part of a transition from local government to urban governance since the 1980s. On a generic level this transition involves various processes grouped under headings such as local corporatism (in the 1980s), the displacement of politics (more recently), the delegation or transfer of politico-administrative tasks from codified (democratic) institutions, such as elected authorities or executive agencies, to new governance clusters transcending the jurisdiction of public and territorial confinements.1 What is generally lacking in these contemporary analyses is reference to recurrent patterns of these processes of displacement and delegation of administrative tasks in the modern history of urban governance. Corporatism or functional representation at the local level, for instance, have been studied mainly by political scientists in the slipstream of the neo-corporatist paradigm which emerged in the late 1970s and 1980s.2 However, as recent historical studies have pointed out, similar arrangements were present during the interwar period which had an impact at the local level as wel1.3
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1880-1940年阿姆斯特丹市政管理和权力的分配
在当代城市研究中,新的治理合谋的出现受到了很多关注。自20世纪80年代以来,各种“伙伴关系”、“有组织的利益集群”和“机构间网络”已被确定为从地方政府向城市治理过渡的一部分。在一般的层面上,这种转变涉及到各种各样的过程,如地方社团主义(在20世纪80年代),政治的取代(最近),政治行政任务从编纂的(民主)机构(如民选当局或执行机构)委托或转移到超越公共和领土管辖范围的新治理集群这些当代分析中普遍缺乏的是参考现代城市治理历史中这些流离失所和行政任务授权过程的反复模式。例如,在20世纪70年代末和80年代出现的新社团主义范式中,政治科学家主要研究社团主义或地方层面的功能代表然而,正如最近的历史研究指出的那样,在两次世界大战之间的时期也出现了类似的安排,在地方一级也产生了影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contributors Appendix 1: Election Results- Eupen-Malmedy Communal Elections 1922 Urban Development and Municipal Power: Beijing in the Wave of Globalization Dictating Democracy: the Impact of Governor Baltia's Transitory Regime on Local Government In Eupen-malmedy, 1919-1922. How to Rule a Small Town in Early Twentieth Century Portugal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1