Acculturation or autonomy? Controversy over the status of the Sámi in Finland during the interwar period

K. Alenius
{"title":"Acculturation or autonomy? Controversy over the status of the Sámi in Finland during the interwar period","authors":"K. Alenius","doi":"10.53604/rjbns.v13i1_2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The newly independent Finland in the 1920s and 1930s was, in principle, a nation state in which ethnic Finns had an undisputed leading position. Nevertheless, there was a lively debate about the status that would be given to other nationalities in various spheres of social life. The Swedes were the country’s main national minority (accounting for 10 per cent of the total population), and they were granted extensive minority rights. Another locally significant minority were the Sámi who lived in northern Lapland. This paper analyses the extent to which the majority population was willing to meet the wishes of the Sámi. Some Finns were in favour of the Sámi being acculturated as quickly as possible, but a few activists would have liked to grant the Sámi broad autonomy. Several ministries and government agencies investigated the matter thoroughly, but the result was negative for the Sámi.","PeriodicalId":104344,"journal":{"name":"Multiculturalism and multilingualism in Scandinavia and the Baltic Sea Region","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiculturalism and multilingualism in Scandinavia and the Baltic Sea Region","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53604/rjbns.v13i1_2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The newly independent Finland in the 1920s and 1930s was, in principle, a nation state in which ethnic Finns had an undisputed leading position. Nevertheless, there was a lively debate about the status that would be given to other nationalities in various spheres of social life. The Swedes were the country’s main national minority (accounting for 10 per cent of the total population), and they were granted extensive minority rights. Another locally significant minority were the Sámi who lived in northern Lapland. This paper analyses the extent to which the majority population was willing to meet the wishes of the Sámi. Some Finns were in favour of the Sámi being acculturated as quickly as possible, but a few activists would have liked to grant the Sámi broad autonomy. Several ministries and government agencies investigated the matter thoroughly, but the result was negative for the Sámi.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化适应还是自主?关于两次世界大战期间Sámi在芬兰地位的争议
在20世纪20年代和30年代刚刚独立的芬兰,原则上是一个民族国家,芬兰人在其中拥有无可争议的领导地位。尽管如此,对于在社会生活的各个领域中给予其他民族的地位,人们进行了热烈的辩论。瑞典人是该国主要的少数民族(占总人口的10%),他们享有广泛的少数民族权利。另一个当地重要的少数民族是居住在拉普兰北部的Sámi。本文分析了大多数人口愿意满足Sámi愿望的程度。一些芬兰人支持Sámi尽快融入当地文化,但一些积极分子希望给予Sámi更广泛的自治权。虽然几个部门和政府部门对该事件进行了彻底的调查,但对Sámi的调查结果是否定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge of Russian and Estonian – an aisle of Finnish–Russian–Estonian relations On semantic and semiotic multilingualism in earlier and latest works of Sabira Ståhlberg and Tzveta Sofronieva The family tree – a challenge for multicultural learning: some aspects of Swedish, Serbian and Bulgarian kinship terminology Acculturation or autonomy? Controversy over the status of the Sámi in Finland during the interwar period Window to a world beyond: Göran Schildt’s journey to Bulgaria and Romania in 1963 and some multilingual and multicultural strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1