Ready to Be Open? Explaining the Firm-Level Barriers to Benefiting from Openness to External Knowledge

J. Birkinshaw, M. Mol, L. F. Monteiro
{"title":"Ready to Be Open? Explaining the Firm-Level Barriers to Benefiting from Openness to External Knowledge","authors":"J. Birkinshaw, M. Mol, L. F. Monteiro","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2585538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides new theory and evidence about the benefits of openness on a firm’s innovation performance and, more importantly, the specific firm-level contingencies under which those benefits are more (or less) likely to be observed. Building on Dyer and Singh’s (1998) relational view, we suggest that a firm’s lack of resources and absorptive capacity, as well as its use of secrecy, are significant barriers to benefiting from openness to external knowledge. Using responses from 12,152 firms to the fourth and fifth UK versions of the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) we generate findings consistent with our hypotheses.","PeriodicalId":122208,"journal":{"name":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"99","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2585538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 99

Abstract

This paper provides new theory and evidence about the benefits of openness on a firm’s innovation performance and, more importantly, the specific firm-level contingencies under which those benefits are more (or less) likely to be observed. Building on Dyer and Singh’s (1998) relational view, we suggest that a firm’s lack of resources and absorptive capacity, as well as its use of secrecy, are significant barriers to benefiting from openness to external knowledge. Using responses from 12,152 firms to the fourth and fifth UK versions of the Community Innovation Survey (CIS) we generate findings consistent with our hypotheses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准备好开放了吗?解释企业从对外知识开放中获益的障碍
本文提供了关于开放对企业创新绩效的好处的新理论和证据,更重要的是,在特定的公司层面上,这些好处更有可能(或更少)被观察到。基于Dyer和Singh(1998)的关系观点,我们认为企业缺乏资源和吸收能力,以及对保密的使用,是从对外开放知识中获益的重大障碍。利用12,152家公司对英国第四和第五次社区创新调查(CIS)的回应,我们得出了与我们的假设一致的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermodynamics and Gradient Manipulation Mechanism in Entrepreneurial Actions Leading a Board of Directors in The United Kingdom: Indirect Leadership Curbing the Opioid Epidemic at its Root: The Effect of Provider Discordance after Opioid Initiation A Study on Construction of an Investment Portfolio Using Fundamental Analysis Explaining the Erosion of Relational Care Continuity: An Empirical Analysis of Primary Care in England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1