Percepción estética del paciente desdentado comparada con la opinión de expertos

Carola Orrego-Ramírez , Carmen Meza-Fuentealba , Cristian Vergara-Núñez , Ximena Lee-Muñoz , Nicolás Schleyer-Daza
{"title":"Percepción estética del paciente desdentado comparada con la opinión de expertos","authors":"Carola Orrego-Ramírez ,&nbsp;Carmen Meza-Fuentealba ,&nbsp;Cristian Vergara-Núñez ,&nbsp;Ximena Lee-Muñoz ,&nbsp;Nicolás Schleyer-Daza","doi":"10.1016/j.piro.2015.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the relationship between the aesthetic self-perception of edentulous patients rehabilitated with dentures and the opinion of facial aesthetics experts.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Two facial 3D photographs, without dentures and with new dentures, respectively, were taken of a convenience sample of 40 edentulous patients. The images were subsequently shown to the patients, and they assessed their satisfaction of the facial change using Likert scale question. The photographs of the patients were also shown to 5 professionals with specialties related to facial aesthetics. Facial change was evaluated using the same Likert scale as the patients. Finally, the results were compared using the non-parametric Wilcoxon test to determine any statistical differences between the preferences of patients and the experts.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The perception of patients and experts are positive. Significant statistical differences were found after comparing the responses of both groups, with p=.00, with the experts being more critical in their assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The aesthetic perception of edentulous patients rehabilitated with complete dentures and the opinion of a panel of aesthetic experts are concordant, both being positive. It is important to note that experts were more critical in their assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21203,"journal":{"name":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 54-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.piro.2015.11.001","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0718539115001251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective

To determine the relationship between the aesthetic self-perception of edentulous patients rehabilitated with dentures and the opinion of facial aesthetics experts.

Materials and methods

Two facial 3D photographs, without dentures and with new dentures, respectively, were taken of a convenience sample of 40 edentulous patients. The images were subsequently shown to the patients, and they assessed their satisfaction of the facial change using Likert scale question. The photographs of the patients were also shown to 5 professionals with specialties related to facial aesthetics. Facial change was evaluated using the same Likert scale as the patients. Finally, the results were compared using the non-parametric Wilcoxon test to determine any statistical differences between the preferences of patients and the experts.

Results

The perception of patients and experts are positive. Significant statistical differences were found after comparing the responses of both groups, with p=.00, with the experts being more critical in their assessment.

Conclusion

The aesthetic perception of edentulous patients rehabilitated with complete dentures and the opinion of a panel of aesthetic experts are concordant, both being positive. It is important to note that experts were more critical in their assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无牙患者的审美感知与专家意见的比较
目的探讨义齿修复无牙患者的审美自我知觉与面部美学专家意见的关系。材料与方法选取40例无牙患者作为方便样本,分别拍摄无义齿和新义齿两组面部三维照片。随后将这些图像展示给患者,并使用李克特量表评估他们对面部变化的满意度。患者的照片也被展示给5位面部美学专业的专家。面部变化采用与患者相同的李克特量表进行评估。最后,使用非参数Wilcoxon检验对结果进行比较,以确定患者和专家偏好之间的统计差异。结果患者和专家的评价是肯定的。两组疗效比较,差异有统计学意义,p=。00,专家们在他们的评估中更加挑剔。结论全口义齿修复无牙患者的审美认知与美学专家的评价一致,均为正面评价。值得注意的是,专家们在他们的评估中更为挑剔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flujo salival y caries radicular en adultos mayores autovalentes Necesidad de tratamiento periodontal en adolescentes de 12 años de colegios municipalizados en Valdivia–Chile 2014: estudio transversal Impacto de la hipomineralización incisivo molar en la experiencia de caries en escolares de 6-12 años en Santiago, Chile Repigmentación melánica de la melanosis gingival. Revisión sistemática Marsupialización modificada de ránula gigante intraoral: reporte de caso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1