Assessment of Farmers’ Perception Towards the Usage of Banned Agrochemicals: Case Study of Amaranth Farmers in Ekiti State, Nigeria

S. Ogunjimi, Samuel Victor-Sunday
{"title":"Assessment of Farmers’ Perception Towards the Usage of Banned Agrochemicals: Case Study of Amaranth Farmers in Ekiti State, Nigeria","authors":"S. Ogunjimi, Samuel Victor-Sunday","doi":"10.2478/contagri-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The study assessed farmers’ perception towards the usage of banned agrochemicals in Ekiti State, Nigeria. A multistage sampling procedure was used to select one hundred and twenty farmers from three amaranth producing Local Government Areas of Ekiti state. The average age of the farmers was 41, with the majority (81.7%) of male farmers. The average years of schooling was approximately 10 years with an average annual income of 212,000 Naira (600 US Dollar). The study showed that 85% of the vegetable farmers obtained information on the use of agrochemicals from sales agents (agrochemicals retailers), 77.5% from fellow farmers and 32.5% from extension workers. The study further revealed that the majority of the amaranth farmers (99.2%) were aware that some agrochemicals had been banned. All the respondents were using agrochemicals for production of amaranth and farmers also indicated that they still used some of banned chemicals such as Gammalin (87%), Dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) (17%) and Aldrin (16%). The farmers used banned agrochemicals because they perceived them as effective in the pest and disease control (98%), inexpensive (66%), available in the market (59%) and because of advice given by sales agents (58%). The findings revealed that the amaranth farmers have a high level of awareness of the negative effects produced by continuous usage of banned agrochemicals, while the majority of the farmers continuously use them. Therefore, the study highlights the need for adequate registration of all approved agrochemicals by the competent agency. Also, enlightenment campaigns by extension agents on the effects of banned agrochemicals need to be organised for amaranth farmers and sellers, as well as suppliers of agrochemicals. Finally, banned agrochemicals should not be allowed into the country by the federal Ministry of Agriculture and Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA).","PeriodicalId":221412,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Agriculture","volume":"906 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/contagri-2022-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary The study assessed farmers’ perception towards the usage of banned agrochemicals in Ekiti State, Nigeria. A multistage sampling procedure was used to select one hundred and twenty farmers from three amaranth producing Local Government Areas of Ekiti state. The average age of the farmers was 41, with the majority (81.7%) of male farmers. The average years of schooling was approximately 10 years with an average annual income of 212,000 Naira (600 US Dollar). The study showed that 85% of the vegetable farmers obtained information on the use of agrochemicals from sales agents (agrochemicals retailers), 77.5% from fellow farmers and 32.5% from extension workers. The study further revealed that the majority of the amaranth farmers (99.2%) were aware that some agrochemicals had been banned. All the respondents were using agrochemicals for production of amaranth and farmers also indicated that they still used some of banned chemicals such as Gammalin (87%), Dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) (17%) and Aldrin (16%). The farmers used banned agrochemicals because they perceived them as effective in the pest and disease control (98%), inexpensive (66%), available in the market (59%) and because of advice given by sales agents (58%). The findings revealed that the amaranth farmers have a high level of awareness of the negative effects produced by continuous usage of banned agrochemicals, while the majority of the farmers continuously use them. Therefore, the study highlights the need for adequate registration of all approved agrochemicals by the competent agency. Also, enlightenment campaigns by extension agents on the effects of banned agrochemicals need to be organised for amaranth farmers and sellers, as well as suppliers of agrochemicals. Finally, banned agrochemicals should not be allowed into the country by the federal Ministry of Agriculture and Federal Environmental Protection Agency (FEPA).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估农民对禁用农药使用的看法:尼日利亚埃基蒂州苋菜农民的案例研究
该研究评估了尼日利亚埃基蒂州农民对禁用农用化学品使用的看法。采用多阶段抽样程序,从埃基蒂州三个生产苋菜的地方政府区选择了120名农民。农民平均年龄41岁,以男性农民居多(81.7%)。平均受教育年限约为10年,平均年收入为212,000奈拉(600美元)。研究表明,85%的菜农从销售代理商(农药零售商)那里获得农用化学品的使用信息,77.5%从其他农民那里获得,32.5%从推广人员那里获得。该研究进一步显示,大多数种植苋菜的农民(99.2%)知道一些农用化学品已被禁用。所有答复者都在使用农用化学品生产苋菜,农民还表示,他们仍在使用一些被禁用的化学品,如Gammalin(87%)、二氯二苯三氯乙烷(DDT)(17%)和Aldrin(16%)。农民使用禁用的农用化学品是因为他们认为这些化学品在防治病虫害方面有效(98%)、价格低廉(66%)、市场上有售(59%)以及听从销售代理的建议(58%)。调查结果显示,苋菜农民对持续使用禁用农药产生的负面影响有很高的认识,而且大多数农民持续使用这些农药。因此,该研究强调了主管机构对所有批准的农用化学品进行充分登记的必要性。此外,推广机构需要为苋菜农民和销售商以及农用化学品供应商组织关于禁用农用化学品影响的启蒙运动。最后,联邦农业部和联邦环境保护局(FEPA)不应该允许被禁止的农用化学品进入该国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Occurrence of Heavy Metals (Cd, Pb, As, Hg) in the Liver of Wild Boars in the Republic of North Macedonia Comparative Floristic Analysis (2004 and 2022) Of The Natural Monument “Stari Park” In Temerin, Serbia Diagnosis of Soil Salinity in the Low-Chellif Plain, North-West Algeria, By Joint Measurements Of Electrical And Hydraulic Conductivities Morphometric Study of Erythrocytes in Donkeys and Horses Evaluation of Pulmonary Lesions in Slaughtered Fatteners as Indicators of Respiratory Diseases in Pigs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1