"Fly Me to the Moon": Verification of Aerospace Systems

D. Giannakopoulou
{"title":"\"Fly Me to the Moon\": Verification of Aerospace Systems","authors":"D. Giannakopoulou","doi":"10.1109/SEFM.2010.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The safety-critical nature of aerospace systems mandates the development of advanced formal verification techniques that provide desired correctness guarantees. In this paper, we present two inherently different approaches towards achieving this goal. The first approach aims at scaling exhaustive verification techniques by applying divide-and-conquer principles. It involves automated compositional verification algorithms for model checking both finite and infinite-state software components. The second approach does not perform exhaustive verification but it is more versatile. It uses a model checker to automatically generate tests for aerospace algorithms and only requires knowledge of the types of inputs that the algorithms process. We will discuss our experience with formal verification of aerospace systems and analyze the applicability of the two approaches in several settings.","PeriodicalId":211760,"journal":{"name":"2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEFM.2010.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The safety-critical nature of aerospace systems mandates the development of advanced formal verification techniques that provide desired correctness guarantees. In this paper, we present two inherently different approaches towards achieving this goal. The first approach aims at scaling exhaustive verification techniques by applying divide-and-conquer principles. It involves automated compositional verification algorithms for model checking both finite and infinite-state software components. The second approach does not perform exhaustive verification but it is more versatile. It uses a model checker to automatically generate tests for aerospace algorithms and only requires knowledge of the types of inputs that the algorithms process. We will discuss our experience with formal verification of aerospace systems and analyze the applicability of the two approaches in several settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“带我去月球”:航天系统的验证
航空航天系统的安全关键性质要求开发先进的正式验证技术,以提供所需的正确性保证。在本文中,我们提出了两种本质上不同的方法来实现这一目标。第一种方法旨在通过应用分治原则扩展详尽的验证技术。它涉及用于模型检查有限和无限状态软件组件的自动组成验证算法。第二种方法不执行详尽的验证,但它更通用。它使用模型检查器自动生成航空航天算法的测试,并且只需要了解算法处理的输入类型。我们将讨论我们在航空航天系统的正式验证方面的经验,并分析这两种方法在几种情况下的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verification of Dynamic Data Tree with mu-calculus Extended with Separation Refinement-Friendly Bigraphs and Spygraphs Designing Log Architectures for Legal Evidence Behavior Trees: From Systems Engineering to Software Engineering Model Checking Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols: ARAN vs. endairA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1