False-Positive Calcifications and Radiation Dose in Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Iterative Reconstruction on The Basis of a Noise Threshold

D. Grönemeyer, B. Brandts, C. Lehrenfeld, Frauke Metz, M. Garmer, O. Klein-Wiele
{"title":"False-Positive Calcifications and Radiation Dose in Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Iterative Reconstruction on The Basis of a Noise Threshold","authors":"D. Grönemeyer, B. Brandts, C. Lehrenfeld, Frauke Metz, M. Garmer, O. Klein-Wiele","doi":"10.31487/j.rdi.2019.04.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radiation dose from cardiac CT seems to be underestimated. To determine the effect of iterative reconstruction in coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring on false positive lesions and radiation dose using a noise threshold. Noise-based thresholds have been previously suggested to reduce false positive lesions in lower dose protocols. In 388 matched pairs of patients we performed CAC scoring using a 320-row CT-scanner with standard dose filtered backprojection (FBP) and lower dose iterative reconstruction (IR). Dose modulation was based on a noise threshold. Radiation dose, image quality and extent of false-positive calcifications were obtained. IR versus FBP showed a reduced dose length product (median 61 versus 74; p< 0.001), less noise (median SD 14.71 versus 18.07; p< 0.001) and higher signal-to-noise ratio (median 4.01 versus 3.14; p< 0.001). Using IR in 388 patients, a low quantity of false-positive calcifications was found in 302 patients, a moderate quantity in 76 patients and a high quantity in 10 patients, while using FBP, the corresponding distribution of patients was 79, 175 and 134 (p<0.001). In this clinical setting we confirm the observation of a phantom study that CAC scoring using iterative reconstruction and a noise threshold is effective for the reduction of radiation dose.","PeriodicalId":308916,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Medical Diagnostic Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Medical Diagnostic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.rdi.2019.04.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiation dose from cardiac CT seems to be underestimated. To determine the effect of iterative reconstruction in coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring on false positive lesions and radiation dose using a noise threshold. Noise-based thresholds have been previously suggested to reduce false positive lesions in lower dose protocols. In 388 matched pairs of patients we performed CAC scoring using a 320-row CT-scanner with standard dose filtered backprojection (FBP) and lower dose iterative reconstruction (IR). Dose modulation was based on a noise threshold. Radiation dose, image quality and extent of false-positive calcifications were obtained. IR versus FBP showed a reduced dose length product (median 61 versus 74; p< 0.001), less noise (median SD 14.71 versus 18.07; p< 0.001) and higher signal-to-noise ratio (median 4.01 versus 3.14; p< 0.001). Using IR in 388 patients, a low quantity of false-positive calcifications was found in 302 patients, a moderate quantity in 76 patients and a high quantity in 10 patients, while using FBP, the corresponding distribution of patients was 79, 175 and 134 (p<0.001). In this clinical setting we confirm the observation of a phantom study that CAC scoring using iterative reconstruction and a noise threshold is effective for the reduction of radiation dose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于噪声阈值的迭代重建冠状动脉钙化和辐射剂量评分中的假阳性钙化
心脏CT的辐射剂量似乎被低估了。利用噪声阈值确定冠状动脉钙(CAC)评分迭代重建对假阳性病变和辐射剂量的影响。基于噪声的阈值先前已被建议在低剂量方案中减少假阳性病变。在388对匹配的患者中,我们使用标准剂量过滤反向投影(FBP)和低剂量迭代重建(IR)的320排ct扫描仪进行CAC评分。剂量调制是基于噪声阈值。获得辐射剂量、图像质量和假阳性钙化程度。与FBP相比,IR显示剂量长度乘积减少(中位数61比74;p< 0.001),噪声较小(SD中位数14.71 vs 18.07;P < 0.001)和更高的信噪比(中位数4.01 vs 3.14;p < 0.001)。在388例患者中,IR检出低量钙化302例,中等量76例,高量10例,而FBP检出相应的分布分别为79例、175例和134例(p<0.001)。在这个临床环境中,我们证实了一项幻影研究的观察结果,即使用迭代重建和噪声阈值的CAC评分对于降低辐射剂量是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Size Specific Dose Estimate in Abdominal Computed Tomography by AAPM TG Report-204 and AAPM TG Report-220 A Potential Solution to Assess the Absorbed Dose at Any Point in Breast During Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Imaging Using a Novel Monte Carlo Simulation Software Quantitative Assessment of Iodine Intensity of Different Types of Lesions in the Low-Energy (LE) Images of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) Radiological Correlation of Negative Appendectomies: A Clinical Audit A Short Review of Benefits of Using Chest CT Characteristics for Early diagnoses to Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1