{"title":"Assessing the Agility of Teams within Mechatronic Product Development","authors":"L. Becerril, C. Hollauer, U. Lindemann","doi":"10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although agile development is increasingly being applied outside software development, the methods, tools and techniques are still new to the manufacturing industry. A major barrier is the difficulty to measure the benefits and limitations. Comparing the working practices of a team before and after implementing agile methods would provide some insights into the applicability and usefulness of concrete methods and tools in the context of mechatronic-product development. Nevertheless, existing agility assessment approaches are subjective, software centered, and/or require previous application of agile methods. The goal of this paper is to provide a holistic assessment of a team’s agility independently of the methods, tools and techniques applied. For this purpose, agile, non-agile and hybrid practices provide a frame of reference to characterize how teams work across 12 project processes (e.g. project monitoring) and five levels of agility.","PeriodicalId":119238,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although agile development is increasingly being applied outside software development, the methods, tools and techniques are still new to the manufacturing industry. A major barrier is the difficulty to measure the benefits and limitations. Comparing the working practices of a team before and after implementing agile methods would provide some insights into the applicability and usefulness of concrete methods and tools in the context of mechatronic-product development. Nevertheless, existing agility assessment approaches are subjective, software centered, and/or require previous application of agile methods. The goal of this paper is to provide a holistic assessment of a team’s agility independently of the methods, tools and techniques applied. For this purpose, agile, non-agile and hybrid practices provide a frame of reference to characterize how teams work across 12 project processes (e.g. project monitoring) and five levels of agility.