{"title":"The Reliability and Viewer Interest of YouTube® Videos Presenting Endoscopic Ear Procedures","authors":"H. Baran, E. Elibol","doi":"10.24179/kbbbbc.2021-87187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABS TRACT Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and viewer interests of YouTube ® endoscopic ear surgery videos based on the LAP ‑ VEGaS video quality assessment tool. Material and Methods: The present study evaluated 720 videos after a search on YouTube® with the keywords “endoscopic tympanoplasty, endoscopic ear surgery, endoscopic myringoplasty, and endoscopic mastoidectomy” during the time period between October 2005 to June 2020. The parameters depicting viewer interest such as the total number of views, comments, subscribers, likes, dislikes, source of videos, and video up- load date were assessed. Besides, LAP ‑ VEGaS video quality assessment tool were also analyzed. Results: Among 720 videos that were compatible with the keywords of the study, only 201 (27%) of them were in agreement with the inclusion criteria. Low-quality videos com- prised 164 (81.5%) videos, and high-quality videos consisted of 37 (18.5%) videos. The video rates presented by universities were higher in the high-quality video group than the low-quality video group (29.7% vs. 9.1%). Considering the didactic voice and the presence of didactic steps, it was significantly higher in the high-quality video group compared to the low-quality video group (86.5% vs. 22.6%, p<0.001; 97.3% vs. 85.4%, p: 0.04, respectively). The higher image quality was observed in the high-quality group compared to the low-quality qual- ity group (81.1% vs. 27.4%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Overall, only 18.5% of YouTube ® videos were defined as high-quality videos. The videos classified in the high-quality group were presented by university hospitals, with better didactic information and voice.","PeriodicalId":157542,"journal":{"name":"Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24179/kbbbbc.2021-87187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABS TRACT Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and viewer interests of YouTube ® endoscopic ear surgery videos based on the LAP ‑ VEGaS video quality assessment tool. Material and Methods: The present study evaluated 720 videos after a search on YouTube® with the keywords “endoscopic tympanoplasty, endoscopic ear surgery, endoscopic myringoplasty, and endoscopic mastoidectomy” during the time period between October 2005 to June 2020. The parameters depicting viewer interest such as the total number of views, comments, subscribers, likes, dislikes, source of videos, and video up- load date were assessed. Besides, LAP ‑ VEGaS video quality assessment tool were also analyzed. Results: Among 720 videos that were compatible with the keywords of the study, only 201 (27%) of them were in agreement with the inclusion criteria. Low-quality videos com- prised 164 (81.5%) videos, and high-quality videos consisted of 37 (18.5%) videos. The video rates presented by universities were higher in the high-quality video group than the low-quality video group (29.7% vs. 9.1%). Considering the didactic voice and the presence of didactic steps, it was significantly higher in the high-quality video group compared to the low-quality video group (86.5% vs. 22.6%, p<0.001; 97.3% vs. 85.4%, p: 0.04, respectively). The higher image quality was observed in the high-quality group compared to the low-quality qual- ity group (81.1% vs. 27.4%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Overall, only 18.5% of YouTube ® videos were defined as high-quality videos. The videos classified in the high-quality group were presented by university hospitals, with better didactic information and voice.
目的:本研究旨在基于LAP - VEGaS视频质量评估工具评估YouTube®内窥镜耳部手术视频的可靠性和观众兴趣。材料和方法:本研究对2005年10月至2020年6月期间在YouTube®上搜索关键词“内窥镜鼓室成形术、内窥镜耳部手术、内窥镜鼓膜成形术和内窥镜乳突切除术”的720个视频进行了评估。描述观看者兴趣的参数,如观看总数、评论、订阅者、喜欢、不喜欢、视频来源和视频加载日期被评估。此外,还对LAP - VEGaS视频质量评估工具进行了分析。结果:在720个符合研究关键词的视频中,只有201个(27%)视频符合纳入标准。低质量视频有164个(81.5%),高质量视频有37个(18.5%)。高质量视频组的大学录象率高于低质量视频组(29.7%比9.1%)。考虑到教学声音和教学步骤的存在,高质量视频组明显高于低质量视频组(86.5% vs. 22.6%, p<0.001;97.3% vs. 85.4%, p: 0.04)。高质量组的图像质量高于低质量组(81.1% vs. 27.4%, p<0.001)。结论:总体而言,只有18.5%的YouTube®视频被定义为高质量视频。高质量组的视频由大学医院提供,具有更好的教学信息和声音。