{"title":"Ethnozoological trade and practices among the Ijebu people of South-Western Nigeria and the impact on some mammalian species","authors":"F. Abayomi, G. Dedeke","doi":"10.4314/INDILINGA.V5I2.26410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A survey of some mammals useed in ethnozoological practices was carried out among the Ijebu people of south-western Nigeria. Open-ended, structured questionnaires were administered to 60 traders at various markets in five towns, namely, Ijebu-Ode, Ijebu-\nImusin, Ijebu-Ife, Ijebu-Igbo and Sagamu. Ninety percent (90%) of the traders were\nfemales, sixty-four percent (64%) were traditonalists, seventy-five percent (75%) had no\nformal education and thirty-three percent (33%) were between the ages of 36–45 years.\nThe traders claimed the wild vertebrates had an array of zootherapeutic uses. These\nranged from cures of bone pains and rheumatism, kleptomania, leprosy, impotency,\ninfertility, healing of wounds and bone fractures and the preparation of aphrodisiacs. Other\nuses included the preparation of charms or amulets for protection, good fortune, reverence\nfrom peers and elders, love charms and money rituals. Eleven of the twenty-three species\nsurveyed were listed as threatened in Nigeria's Endangered Species (Control of International Trade and Traffic) Decree 11 of 1985 and the Control of International Trade in\nEndangered Species (CITES). Some of these include leopard, pangolin, gorilla, colobus\nmonkey, wildcat and chimpanzee. Further research is necessary to authenticate the\ntherapeutic claims of the traders. It is also important to educate the traders and people in\ngeneral on the effect of their trade on the threatened species and the likely impact on\nbiodiversity. Keywords : zootherapy, ethnozoology, impact, uses. Indilinga Vol. 5 (2) 2006: pp. 175-187","PeriodicalId":151323,"journal":{"name":"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems","volume":"353 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/INDILINGA.V5I2.26410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
A survey of some mammals useed in ethnozoological practices was carried out among the Ijebu people of south-western Nigeria. Open-ended, structured questionnaires were administered to 60 traders at various markets in five towns, namely, Ijebu-Ode, Ijebu-
Imusin, Ijebu-Ife, Ijebu-Igbo and Sagamu. Ninety percent (90%) of the traders were
females, sixty-four percent (64%) were traditonalists, seventy-five percent (75%) had no
formal education and thirty-three percent (33%) were between the ages of 36–45 years.
The traders claimed the wild vertebrates had an array of zootherapeutic uses. These
ranged from cures of bone pains and rheumatism, kleptomania, leprosy, impotency,
infertility, healing of wounds and bone fractures and the preparation of aphrodisiacs. Other
uses included the preparation of charms or amulets for protection, good fortune, reverence
from peers and elders, love charms and money rituals. Eleven of the twenty-three species
surveyed were listed as threatened in Nigeria's Endangered Species (Control of International Trade and Traffic) Decree 11 of 1985 and the Control of International Trade in
Endangered Species (CITES). Some of these include leopard, pangolin, gorilla, colobus
monkey, wildcat and chimpanzee. Further research is necessary to authenticate the
therapeutic claims of the traders. It is also important to educate the traders and people in
general on the effect of their trade on the threatened species and the likely impact on
biodiversity. Keywords : zootherapy, ethnozoology, impact, uses. Indilinga Vol. 5 (2) 2006: pp. 175-187