Comparison of Continuous Infusion of Intravenous Tramadol and Fentanyl on Postoperative Analgesia in Cardiac Surgery

Kaneez Ume Farwa, Waseema Afzal, Shumaila Ali Rai, T. Malik, Hafiz Haseeb Ahsan, Fatima Skina
{"title":"Comparison of Continuous Infusion of Intravenous Tramadol and Fentanyl on Postoperative Analgesia in Cardiac Surgery","authors":"Kaneez Ume Farwa, Waseema Afzal, Shumaila Ali Rai, T. Malik, Hafiz Haseeb Ahsan, Fatima Skina","doi":"10.53350/pjmhs221610268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy between the fentanyl and tramadol infusion on post-operative cure of pain after a valvular heart surgery. Methods: Total of 40 patients were included in the study who underwent valvular heart surgery. Patients were divided into two groups, 20 patients were included in Tramadol group while 20 patients were assigned the Fentanyl group. After getting off from cardiopulmonary bypass pump (CPB), drug infusions were started. The drugs were continued for a duration of 48 hours after the surgery. The dose of Fentanyl was 0.5-1ug.kg-1.h-1 through continuous infusion for about 48 hours whereas Tramadol was given at a dose of 0.1-0.2 mg.kg- 1.h-1. Additionally, both the groups were also given intravenous paracetamol 1gm every 8 hours. Verbal rating scale comprising of 11 points was used to assess the efficacy of analgesia. The interval of data collection was 6h, 12h, 24h, 36h and 48h after surgery. Results: The mean cross clamping time, CPB time, mechanical ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay of group F was 90.51±5.18 minutes, 120.65±5.58 minutes, 589.45±3.64 minutes, 4.01±0.45 days and 8.11±1.97 days, respectively. While, the mean cross clamping time, CPB time, mechanical ventilation time, ICU day and hospital days of group T was 86.91±4.11 minutes, 111.31±2.84 minutes, 507.45±5.54 minutes, 3.15±0.67 days and 7.4±1.14 days, respectively. The differences were statistically significant except hospital days (p=0.1777). Conclusion: It is evident from the given study that tramadol infusion is having equally analgesic characteristics as compared to fentanyl infusion after valvular heart surgery. Keywords: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), Postoperative analgesia, Pain relief, assessment, Tramadol infusion.","PeriodicalId":296492,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","volume":"440 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs221610268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy between the fentanyl and tramadol infusion on post-operative cure of pain after a valvular heart surgery. Methods: Total of 40 patients were included in the study who underwent valvular heart surgery. Patients were divided into two groups, 20 patients were included in Tramadol group while 20 patients were assigned the Fentanyl group. After getting off from cardiopulmonary bypass pump (CPB), drug infusions were started. The drugs were continued for a duration of 48 hours after the surgery. The dose of Fentanyl was 0.5-1ug.kg-1.h-1 through continuous infusion for about 48 hours whereas Tramadol was given at a dose of 0.1-0.2 mg.kg- 1.h-1. Additionally, both the groups were also given intravenous paracetamol 1gm every 8 hours. Verbal rating scale comprising of 11 points was used to assess the efficacy of analgesia. The interval of data collection was 6h, 12h, 24h, 36h and 48h after surgery. Results: The mean cross clamping time, CPB time, mechanical ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay of group F was 90.51±5.18 minutes, 120.65±5.58 minutes, 589.45±3.64 minutes, 4.01±0.45 days and 8.11±1.97 days, respectively. While, the mean cross clamping time, CPB time, mechanical ventilation time, ICU day and hospital days of group T was 86.91±4.11 minutes, 111.31±2.84 minutes, 507.45±5.54 minutes, 3.15±0.67 days and 7.4±1.14 days, respectively. The differences were statistically significant except hospital days (p=0.1777). Conclusion: It is evident from the given study that tramadol infusion is having equally analgesic characteristics as compared to fentanyl infusion after valvular heart surgery. Keywords: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), Postoperative analgesia, Pain relief, assessment, Tramadol infusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏外科术后持续静脉滴注曲马多与芬太尼镇痛效果的比较
目的:比较芬太尼与曲马多输注治疗心脏瓣膜术后疼痛的疗效。方法:本研究共纳入40例接受心脏瓣膜手术的患者。将患者分为两组,曲马多组20例,芬太尼组20例。停用体外循环泵(CPB)后,开始药物输注。手术后继续用药48小时。芬太尼给药剂量为0.5 ~ 1.5 ug.kg-1.h-1,连续给药约48小时,曲马多给药剂量为0.1 ~ 0.2 mg。公斤- 1. h。另外,两组患者每8小时静脉给予扑热息痛1gm。采用11分的言语评定量表对镇痛效果进行评定。数据采集间隔分别为术后6h、12h、24h、36h、48h。结果:F组平均交叉夹持时间、CPB时间、机械通气时间、ICU住院时间、住院时间分别为90.51±5.18分钟、120.65±5.58分钟、589.45±3.64分钟、4.01±0.45天、8.11±1.97天。T组平均交叉夹持时间、CPB时间、机械通气时间、ICU天数、住院天数分别为86.91±4.11 min、111.31±2.84 min、507.45±5.54 min、3.15±0.67 d、7.4±1.14 d。除住院天数外,差异均有统计学意义(p=0.1777)。结论:本研究表明,与芬太尼输注相比,曲马多在心脏瓣膜手术后具有相同的镇痛特性。关键词:体外循环,术后镇痛,疼痛缓解,评估,曲马多输注
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Audit of Injuries Sustained in Two–Wheeler Accidents in the Metropolitan City of Karachi, Pakistan Real World Data about the Characteristics of Adult Diabetes Mellitus Patients Visiting Outpatient Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Examine the Efficacy of Oral Midazolam in Post Operative Pain Reduction in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Effect of Low Dose (100mg/kg) of Zinc Telluride (ZnTe) on Hematology of Male Albino Mice (Mus musculus) Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Typhidot Test Against Blood Culture in Diagnosis of Enteric Fever
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1