Do Android app users care about accessibility?: an analysis of user reviews on the Google play store

M. Eler, Leandro Orlandin, Alberto Dumont Alves Oliveira
{"title":"Do Android app users care about accessibility?: an analysis of user reviews on the Google play store","authors":"M. Eler, Leandro Orlandin, Alberto Dumont Alves Oliveira","doi":"10.1145/3357155.3358477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile applications (or apps) have become a popular platform to provide users with information, digital content and services. Unfortunately, many studies have shown that even popular mobile applications still have many accessibility issues. A particular characteristic of mobile development is that developers tend to take into account comments published on official app stores to plan for new releases of their apps. Some researchers have classified user reviews into different categories, including user interface issues, but none of them have investigated whether accessibility is a topic addressed by user comments. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to present an investigation we carried out to find out whether and how accessible is addressed by user reviews published on app stores. In our investigation, we analysed 701 Android apps available on the Google Play Store and found out that reviews associated with accessibility are scarce (1.2% of all reviews); user reviews usually refer to a small subset of accessibility issues; and users give reasonable good scores to mobile apps even when they report accessibility issues, with the exception of very specific cases. It seems our results show that user reviews have not been used to suggest developers to improve mobile apps accessibility.","PeriodicalId":237718,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3357155.3358477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Mobile applications (or apps) have become a popular platform to provide users with information, digital content and services. Unfortunately, many studies have shown that even popular mobile applications still have many accessibility issues. A particular characteristic of mobile development is that developers tend to take into account comments published on official app stores to plan for new releases of their apps. Some researchers have classified user reviews into different categories, including user interface issues, but none of them have investigated whether accessibility is a topic addressed by user comments. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to present an investigation we carried out to find out whether and how accessible is addressed by user reviews published on app stores. In our investigation, we analysed 701 Android apps available on the Google Play Store and found out that reviews associated with accessibility are scarce (1.2% of all reviews); user reviews usually refer to a small subset of accessibility issues; and users give reasonable good scores to mobile apps even when they report accessibility issues, with the exception of very specific cases. It seems our results show that user reviews have not been used to suggest developers to improve mobile apps accessibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Android应用用户关心可访问性吗?:对Google play商店用户评论的分析
移动应用程序(或应用程序)已经成为为用户提供信息、数字内容和服务的流行平台。不幸的是,许多研究表明,即使是流行的移动应用程序仍然存在许多可访问性问题。手机开发的一个特点是,开发者倾向于参考官方应用商店发布的评论来计划新应用的发布。一些研究人员将用户评论分为不同的类别,包括用户界面问题,但没有人研究过用户评论是否涉及可访问性。因此,本文的目的是呈现我们进行的一项调查,以找出应用商店上发布的用户评论是否以及如何解决可访问性问题。在我们的调查中,我们分析了Google Play Store上的701款Android应用,发现与可访问性相关的评论很少(占所有评论的1.2%);用户评论通常指的是可访问性问题的一小部分;除了非常特殊的情况外,即使用户报告了可访问性问题,他们也会给手机应用打出合理的高分。我们的研究结果似乎表明,用户评论并没有被用来建议开发者改进手机应用的可访问性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Art accessibility for blind people: a process to create and understand photography CargoAffect Creating chatbots to talk with humans: HCI evaluations and perspectives Scope and definition of user experience in Brazil: a survey to explore community's perspectives Open design: a systematic mapping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1