{"title":"Preservice Teachers’ Social Justice Teaching Beliefs and Attributions of Black Boys’ Classroom Behavior","authors":"Pamela W. Garner, Kyndra V. Middleton","doi":"10.1080/10409289.2023.2257575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTResearch Findings: We examined whether early childhood preservice teachers’ emotional competence and commitment to social emotional learning moderated associations between their beliefs about social justice and self-reported tolerance for and conceptions of the negative costs of Black preschool boys’ challenging classroom behavior. The 164 participants were mostly White and female. Participants reported on their social justice teaching beliefs, emotional competence, and commitment to social emotional learning. Tolerance for Black boys’ challenging behavior and perceptions of the likely outcomes of behavior were assessed via hypothetical vignettes. Participants with teaching experience scored higher on emotional competence. Black boys were perceived as more likely to experience greater negative academic costs for challenging behavior. The association between social justice teaching beliefs and conceptions of Black boys’ challenging behavior as having high negative social costs was positive for preservice teachers high in emotional competence, but negative when emotional competence was low. The association between social justice teaching beliefs and conceptions of Black boys’ challenging behavior as having high negative social costs was also positive for participants low in the commitment to social emotional learning. Practice and Policy: Results are discussed in relation to early childhood teacher preparation for culturally responsive instructional and classroom management practices. AcknowledgmentsWe thank the preservice teachers who participated in this research and the research assistants for their help with data collection and coding.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":11448,"journal":{"name":"Early Education and Development","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2023.2257575","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTResearch Findings: We examined whether early childhood preservice teachers’ emotional competence and commitment to social emotional learning moderated associations between their beliefs about social justice and self-reported tolerance for and conceptions of the negative costs of Black preschool boys’ challenging classroom behavior. The 164 participants were mostly White and female. Participants reported on their social justice teaching beliefs, emotional competence, and commitment to social emotional learning. Tolerance for Black boys’ challenging behavior and perceptions of the likely outcomes of behavior were assessed via hypothetical vignettes. Participants with teaching experience scored higher on emotional competence. Black boys were perceived as more likely to experience greater negative academic costs for challenging behavior. The association between social justice teaching beliefs and conceptions of Black boys’ challenging behavior as having high negative social costs was positive for preservice teachers high in emotional competence, but negative when emotional competence was low. The association between social justice teaching beliefs and conceptions of Black boys’ challenging behavior as having high negative social costs was also positive for participants low in the commitment to social emotional learning. Practice and Policy: Results are discussed in relation to early childhood teacher preparation for culturally responsive instructional and classroom management practices. AcknowledgmentsWe thank the preservice teachers who participated in this research and the research assistants for their help with data collection and coding.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
期刊介绍:
Early Education and Development (EE&D) is a professional journal for those involved in educational and preschool services and research related to children and their families: early education supervisors, school psychologists, daycare administrators, child development specialists, developmental and child clinical psychologists, and special education administrators. It is designed to emphasize the implications for practice of research and solid scientific information. The age range focused upon is preschool through the primary grades. EE&D is a connecting link between the research community in early education and child development and school district early education programs, daycare systems, and special needs preschool programs.