In-vitro comparison of TruNatomy and XP-endo Shaper on amount of dentin removal: A micro-computed tomography study

Elaf A Rehan, Radwa S Emara, Geraldine M Ahmed
{"title":"In-vitro comparison of TruNatomy and XP-endo Shaper on amount of dentin removal: A micro-computed tomography study","authors":"Elaf A Rehan, Radwa S Emara, Geraldine M Ahmed","doi":"10.54905/disssi/v27i138/e322ms3143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To use micro-computed tomography to assess the effectiveness of the TruNatomy versus the XP-endo Shaper for removing dentin from single-rooted permanent teeth with straight root canals. Materials and Methods: Ninety-eight extracted human single-root teeth were collected and divided into two equal groups: TruNatomy and XP-endo Shaper (XPS). Root canal instrumentation was done for each system. Pre-and post-instrumentation images were scanned by using Skyscan 1172 micro-CT scanner at a resolution of 13.73 µm to measure dentin removal, differences in dentin thickness, and percent change in root canal volume. The data were analyzed using SPSS. Results: The TruNatomy group and XP-endo Shaper had no significant difference regarding the amount of removed dentin. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in post-instrumentation canal volume and dentine removal between TruNatomy and XP-endo Shaper. Thus, both file systems are equally recommended for clinical use as a practice of minimally invasive endodontics.","PeriodicalId":18393,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54905/disssi/v27i138/e322ms3143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To use micro-computed tomography to assess the effectiveness of the TruNatomy versus the XP-endo Shaper for removing dentin from single-rooted permanent teeth with straight root canals. Materials and Methods: Ninety-eight extracted human single-root teeth were collected and divided into two equal groups: TruNatomy and XP-endo Shaper (XPS). Root canal instrumentation was done for each system. Pre-and post-instrumentation images were scanned by using Skyscan 1172 micro-CT scanner at a resolution of 13.73 µm to measure dentin removal, differences in dentin thickness, and percent change in root canal volume. The data were analyzed using SPSS. Results: The TruNatomy group and XP-endo Shaper had no significant difference regarding the amount of removed dentin. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in post-instrumentation canal volume and dentine removal between TruNatomy and XP-endo Shaper. Thus, both file systems are equally recommended for clinical use as a practice of minimally invasive endodontics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔切开术和XP-endo整形术在牙本质去除量上的体外比较:一项显微计算机断层研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science
Medical Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
439
期刊最新文献
Associated risk factors of Poly Cystic Ovarian disease in gynecologist refer; King Saud Medical City Riyadh Saudi Arabia Prevalence and awareness of hypertension among the shopkeepers working in the market in Northern Border Province of Saudi Arabia Imam Abdurrahman Alfaisal Hospital referred cases characteristics and outcomes Association of nurse team level with patient outcome: Systematic review The impact of mouth rinses on the efficacy of fluoride dentifrices in preventing enamel and dentin erosion/abrasion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1