In-vitro comparison of TruNatomy and XP-endo Shaper on amount of dentin removal: A micro-computed tomography study

Elaf A Rehan, Radwa S Emara, Geraldine M Ahmed
{"title":"In-vitro comparison of TruNatomy and XP-endo Shaper on amount of dentin removal: A micro-computed tomography study","authors":"Elaf A Rehan, Radwa S Emara, Geraldine M Ahmed","doi":"10.54905/disssi/v27i138/e322ms3143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To use micro-computed tomography to assess the effectiveness of the TruNatomy versus the XP-endo Shaper for removing dentin from single-rooted permanent teeth with straight root canals. Materials and Methods: Ninety-eight extracted human single-root teeth were collected and divided into two equal groups: TruNatomy and XP-endo Shaper (XPS). Root canal instrumentation was done for each system. Pre-and post-instrumentation images were scanned by using Skyscan 1172 micro-CT scanner at a resolution of 13.73 µm to measure dentin removal, differences in dentin thickness, and percent change in root canal volume. The data were analyzed using SPSS. Results: The TruNatomy group and XP-endo Shaper had no significant difference regarding the amount of removed dentin. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in post-instrumentation canal volume and dentine removal between TruNatomy and XP-endo Shaper. Thus, both file systems are equally recommended for clinical use as a practice of minimally invasive endodontics.","PeriodicalId":18393,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54905/disssi/v27i138/e322ms3143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To use micro-computed tomography to assess the effectiveness of the TruNatomy versus the XP-endo Shaper for removing dentin from single-rooted permanent teeth with straight root canals. Materials and Methods: Ninety-eight extracted human single-root teeth were collected and divided into two equal groups: TruNatomy and XP-endo Shaper (XPS). Root canal instrumentation was done for each system. Pre-and post-instrumentation images were scanned by using Skyscan 1172 micro-CT scanner at a resolution of 13.73 µm to measure dentin removal, differences in dentin thickness, and percent change in root canal volume. The data were analyzed using SPSS. Results: The TruNatomy group and XP-endo Shaper had no significant difference regarding the amount of removed dentin. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in post-instrumentation canal volume and dentine removal between TruNatomy and XP-endo Shaper. Thus, both file systems are equally recommended for clinical use as a practice of minimally invasive endodontics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔切开术和XP-endo整形术在牙本质去除量上的体外比较:一项显微计算机断层研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science
Medical Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
439
期刊最新文献
Impact of subsequent birth and delivery mode for women with previous OASIS: Systemic review Anesthetic management of a patient with a transplanted heart undergoing a cesarean section: A case report Anesthetic management and role in a patient with severe pulmonary hypertension with Eisenmenger physiology undergoing a cesarean section Efficacy of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation in treating acute respiratory distress syndrome Seminal Plasma effectiveness in IVF treatment: Systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1