Psychometric properties of the Stress Coping Scale Brief-COPE 28 in a Peruvian population

Neicer Joel Delgado-Requejo, Julio Cesar Castillo Ramos, Lourdes Carolina Cerda Sánchez
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Stress Coping Scale Brief-COPE 28 in a Peruvian population","authors":"Neicer Joel Delgado-Requejo, Julio Cesar Castillo Ramos, Lourdes Carolina Cerda Sánchez","doi":"10.24016/2023.v9.333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The highly stressful events we are currently experiencing require great cognitive and emotional effort and affect the mental health of the population. In this sense, coping with stress provides evidence of how people use their resources to cope with or avoid stressful events, which requires validated and reliable instruments to measure accurately. Objective: To determine the psychometric properties of reliability and validity of the BRIEF COPE 28, Spanish version. Method: The design used was instrumental; 530 people participated, 60% men and 40% women, between 18 and 60 years old, from different regions of Peru, selected by non-probability convenience sampling. Results: It is evident that the alpha coefficient of coping styles ranges from α ordinal = 0.74 to 0.82; while in strategies it was between α ordinal = 0.59 to 0.90. In terms of internal structure, the four-factor model obtained a good fit SB-χ²/gl=1.836; CFI=0.92; TLI=0.90, SRMS=0.09 and RMSEA=0.10. A good fit was found with the ten coping strategies model SB-χ²/gl=1.902; CFI=0.96; TLI=0.95, SRMS=0.056, RMSEA=0.069. Conclusion: COPE 28 has good internal consistency; and the model with the four coping styles is inconclusive, while the model with ten strategies has adequate goodness of fit.","PeriodicalId":53161,"journal":{"name":"Interacciones Revista de Avances en Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interacciones Revista de Avances en Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24016/2023.v9.333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The highly stressful events we are currently experiencing require great cognitive and emotional effort and affect the mental health of the population. In this sense, coping with stress provides evidence of how people use their resources to cope with or avoid stressful events, which requires validated and reliable instruments to measure accurately. Objective: To determine the psychometric properties of reliability and validity of the BRIEF COPE 28, Spanish version. Method: The design used was instrumental; 530 people participated, 60% men and 40% women, between 18 and 60 years old, from different regions of Peru, selected by non-probability convenience sampling. Results: It is evident that the alpha coefficient of coping styles ranges from α ordinal = 0.74 to 0.82; while in strategies it was between α ordinal = 0.59 to 0.90. In terms of internal structure, the four-factor model obtained a good fit SB-χ²/gl=1.836; CFI=0.92; TLI=0.90, SRMS=0.09 and RMSEA=0.10. A good fit was found with the ten coping strategies model SB-χ²/gl=1.902; CFI=0.96; TLI=0.95, SRMS=0.056, RMSEA=0.069. Conclusion: COPE 28 has good internal consistency; and the model with the four coping styles is inconclusive, while the model with ten strategies has adequate goodness of fit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秘鲁人群压力应对量表Brief-COPE 28的心理测量特征
背景:我们目前正在经历的高压力事件需要巨大的认知和情感努力,并影响人口的心理健康。从这个意义上说,应对压力提供了人们如何使用他们的资源来应对或避免压力事件的证据,这需要经过验证和可靠的工具来准确测量。目的:探讨BRIEF COPE 28(西班牙语版)的信度和效度特征。方法:采用仪器设计;530人参与,60%的男性和40%的女性,年龄在18至60岁之间,来自秘鲁的不同地区,通过非概率方便抽样选择。结果:各应对方式的α系数在α序数= 0.74 ~ 0.82之间;而在策略方面,α序数= 0.59 ~ 0.90。内部结构方面,四因子模型拟合较好,SB-χ²/gl=1.836;CFI = 0.92;TLI=0.90, SRMS=0.09, RMSEA=0.10。与十种应对策略模型(SB-χ²/gl=1.902)拟合良好;CFI = 0.96;Tli =0.95, srms =0.056, rmsea =0.069。结论:COPE 28具有良好的内部一致性;四种应对方式的模型不具有结论性,而十种应对方式的模型具有足够的拟合优度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dissociative Experiences Scale: Psychometric Analysis in Puerto Rico and Contributions to the Discussion of the Factor Structure Psychometric properties of the Stress Coping Scale Brief-COPE 28 in a Peruvian population Brief review of pathophysiological disorders as consequence of psychological stress Perception of danger, coping strategies, and mental health in university population Validation Psychometrical analysis of Sexual Machism Scale (EMS-Sexism-12) among university students from Arequipa, Peru
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1