Susceptibility baselines for the invasive mealybugs Phenacoccus manihoti and Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in cassava ecosystem against selected neonicotinoid insecticides

Q4 Immunology and Microbiology Journal of Applied and Natural Science Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.31018/jans.v15i3.4640
Sountharya R, Smitha S. Kumar, Krishnamoorthy S. V., Murugan M, Senthil N., Karthikeyan S.
{"title":"Susceptibility baselines for the invasive mealybugs Phenacoccus manihoti and Paracoccus marginatus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in cassava ecosystem against selected neonicotinoid insecticides","authors":"Sountharya R, Smitha S. Kumar, Krishnamoorthy S. V., Murugan M, Senthil N., Karthikeyan S.","doi":"10.31018/jans.v15i3.4640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, an invasive cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti has been threatening cassava cultivation alongside another invasive papaya mealybug Paracoccus marginatus which invaded the country more than a decade ago. In order to evaluate their responses against the commonly used neonicotinoid insecticides: thiamethoxam 25 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL, acute toxicity experiments to determine the susceptibility baselines in populations of two invasive mealybugs in the cassava agro-ecosystem, namely, cassava mealybug P. manihoti and papaya mealybug P. marginatus were performed upto 15 generations. A systemic uptake method was used for the bioassay. The LC50 values of thiamethoxam for F1 generation were 3.298 ppm whereas it was 1.066 ppm for F15 in cassava mealybug. The LC50 values of F1 generation were 2.014 ppm and that of F15 generation was 1.384 ppm when tested with imidacloprid. In the case of papaya mealybug, the LC50 values ranged from 6.138 ppm (F1) to 2.503 ppm (F15) for thiamethoxam and 7.457 ppm (F1) to 3.231 ppm (F15) for imidacloprid. All the susceptibility indices calculated were less than threefold. The rate of resistance development was negative in all cases showing that none of the tested populations harboured any resistance without insecticidal selection pressure. Tentative discriminating doses were fixed for both chemicals with the help of LC95 values obtained from the bioassay experiments, namely five ppm for both thiamethoxam and imidacloprid in the case of cassava mealybug and 10 ppm and 15 ppm, respectively, for thiamethoxam and imidacloprid in the case of papaya mealybug.","PeriodicalId":14996,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied and Natural Science","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied and Natural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v15i3.4640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, an invasive cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti has been threatening cassava cultivation alongside another invasive papaya mealybug Paracoccus marginatus which invaded the country more than a decade ago. In order to evaluate their responses against the commonly used neonicotinoid insecticides: thiamethoxam 25 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL, acute toxicity experiments to determine the susceptibility baselines in populations of two invasive mealybugs in the cassava agro-ecosystem, namely, cassava mealybug P. manihoti and papaya mealybug P. marginatus were performed upto 15 generations. A systemic uptake method was used for the bioassay. The LC50 values of thiamethoxam for F1 generation were 3.298 ppm whereas it was 1.066 ppm for F15 in cassava mealybug. The LC50 values of F1 generation were 2.014 ppm and that of F15 generation was 1.384 ppm when tested with imidacloprid. In the case of papaya mealybug, the LC50 values ranged from 6.138 ppm (F1) to 2.503 ppm (F15) for thiamethoxam and 7.457 ppm (F1) to 3.231 ppm (F15) for imidacloprid. All the susceptibility indices calculated were less than threefold. The rate of resistance development was negative in all cases showing that none of the tested populations harboured any resistance without insecticidal selection pressure. Tentative discriminating doses were fixed for both chemicals with the help of LC95 values obtained from the bioassay experiments, namely five ppm for both thiamethoxam and imidacloprid in the case of cassava mealybug and 10 ppm and 15 ppm, respectively, for thiamethoxam and imidacloprid in the case of papaya mealybug.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
木薯生态系统侵袭性粉蚧马氏粉蚧和边缘副粉蚧对新烟碱类杀虫剂的敏感性基线
近年来,一种入侵木薯粉蚧(Phenacoccus manihoti)与十多年前入侵该国的另一种入侵木瓜粉蚧(Paracoccus marginatus)一起威胁木薯种植。为评价其对新烟碱类杀虫剂噻虫脒25 WG和吡虫啉17.8 SL的反应,对木薯农业生态系统中2种入侵粉蚧(木薯粉蚧P. manihoti和木瓜粉蚧P. marginatus)种群进行了长达15代的急性毒性试验,确定了敏感性基线。采用全身吸收法进行生物测定。噻虫嗪对木薯粉蚧F1代LC50值为3.298 ppm,对F15代LC50值为1.066 ppm。吡虫啉对F1代和F15代的LC50值分别为2.014 ppm和1.384 ppm。对于木瓜粉蚧,噻虫嗪的LC50值为6.138 ppm (F1) ~ 2.503 ppm (F15),吡虫啉的LC50值为7.457 ppm (F1) ~ 3.231 ppm (F15)。所有敏感性指标均小于3倍。在所有情况下,抗性发展率均为负,表明在没有杀虫选择压力的情况下,所有受试种群都不具有任何抗性。根据从生物测定实验中获得的LC95值,确定了这两种化学物质的初步鉴别剂量,即木薯粉虱的噻虫嗪和吡虫啉分别为5 ppm,木瓜粉虱的噻虫嗪和吡虫啉分别为10 ppm和15 ppm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied and Natural Science
Journal of Applied and Natural Science Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
168
期刊最新文献
Contribution to the optimization of citrus (Citrus clementina Hort. Ex Tanaka) fruit fertilization using mobile lysimetry in orchards of the Souss-Massa region, Morocco Identification and characterizations of a few species of Fusarium infecting cucumber in greenhouse conditions Induction of micronuclei in blood and histopathological alterations in gill, kidney and liver of Channa punctatus (Bloch, 1793) exposed to copper sulphate Application of data ratio analysis of lead accumulation in cartilage and bones of goats and chickens in Yogyakarta, Indonesia Development of a parametric-based Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) utilizing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for wheat land suitability evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1