Evaluating trap and lure combinations using Biotraps and Lynfield traps for the surveillance of Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and other tephritids in southern New South Wales, Australia

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY International Journal of Tropical Insect Science Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI:10.1007/s42690-023-01121-4
B. C. Dominiak, C Bain, N Sharma, D Cooper
{"title":"Evaluating trap and lure combinations using Biotraps and Lynfield traps for the surveillance of Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and other tephritids in southern New South Wales, Australia","authors":"B. C. Dominiak, C Bain, N Sharma, D Cooper","doi":"10.1007/s42690-023-01121-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Fruit fly surveillance remains essential for international and domestic trade. The dry cuelure baited Lynfield trap has been the Australian standard since the early 1990s. Here, we tested the two versions of Biotraps against the Lynfield traps in the Riverina area of New South Wales. The Biotraps using a protein gel performed significantly better in trapping Island fly and female Queensland fruit fly. Also, Biotraps were assessed as at least equal to or superior to Lynfield traps for trapping male Queensland fruit fly. However, the number of Newman fly trapped exhibited no significant difference between the two trap types in both time periods A and B. We discuss differences in trap architecture, toxicants and lures between the two traps, along with benefits for storage and transport.","PeriodicalId":14434,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Tropical Insect Science","volume":"19 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Tropical Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-023-01121-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Fruit fly surveillance remains essential for international and domestic trade. The dry cuelure baited Lynfield trap has been the Australian standard since the early 1990s. Here, we tested the two versions of Biotraps against the Lynfield traps in the Riverina area of New South Wales. The Biotraps using a protein gel performed significantly better in trapping Island fly and female Queensland fruit fly. Also, Biotraps were assessed as at least equal to or superior to Lynfield traps for trapping male Queensland fruit fly. However, the number of Newman fly trapped exhibited no significant difference between the two trap types in both time periods A and B. We discuss differences in trap architecture, toxicants and lures between the two traps, along with benefits for storage and transport.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物诱捕器和Lynfield诱捕器对澳大利亚新南威尔士州南部地区鲜小实蝇(双翅目:绢蝇科)和其他绢蝇的监测效果评价
果蝇监测对国际和国内贸易至关重要。自20世纪90年代初以来,以干文化为诱饵的林菲尔德陷阱一直是澳大利亚的标准。在这里,我们在新南威尔士州Riverina地区对两种版本的生物诱捕器与Lynfield诱捕器进行了测试。蛋白凝胶生物诱捕器对岛蝇和雌性昆士兰果蝇的诱捕效果明显较好。此外,生物诱捕器对雄性昆士兰果蝇的诱捕效果至少等于或优于Lynfield诱捕器。然而,在A和b两个时间段,捕获的纽曼蝇数量在两种陷阱类型之间没有显着差异。我们讨论了两种陷阱在陷阱结构,毒物和诱饵方面的差异,以及储存和运输的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
212
期刊介绍: International Journal of Tropical Insect Science is the only journal devoted exclusively to the latest research in tropical and sub-tropical insect science. Each issue brings you original, peer-reviewed research findings on tropical insects and related arthropods, with special emphasis on their environmentally benign and sustainable management. The Journal"s scope includes arthropod ecology and biodiversity, ethno-entomology, arthropod taxonomy, integrated pest and vector management, and environmental issues. The Journal publishes research papers, short communications and scientific notes. The Journal also includes reports of meetings and obituaries of prominent scientists, book reviews, and review and mini-review articles that are normally submitted at the invitation of the Editors.
期刊最新文献
Factors that limit the productive use of Apis mellifera L.– a review Association between temperature and life table development of fall armyworm, spodoptera frugiperda (lepidoptera: noctuidae) under control condition Diversity, relative abundance and functional group composition of ant community in a dry deciduous forest of the South Western Ghats, India Preparation and evaluation of ecofriendly nanocreams containing some plant essential oils and monoterpenes against adults of Culex pipiens L. with some biochemical and histological studies on albino rat The gut microbiota of insects: a potential source of bacteria and metabolites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1