Evaluation of antibiotics using ATC/DDD and DU 90% methods on ICU patients at Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacia Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI:10.3897/pharmacia.70.e103566
Embun Suci Nasution, Hari Ronaldo Tanjung, Inggianti Putri
{"title":"Evaluation of antibiotics using ATC/DDD and DU 90% methods on ICU patients at Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital","authors":"Embun Suci Nasution, Hari Ronaldo Tanjung, Inggianti Putri","doi":"10.3897/pharmacia.70.e103566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Evaluation of the use of antibiotics is the control of antimicrobial resistance. The ATC/DDD method was recommended to evaluate drug use quantitatively which can be used to compare the quantity of antibiotic use between hospitals and between countries. This research was a descriptive study with retrospective data collection cross-sectional. This research was conducted at the ICU of Universitas Sumatera Utara hospital in August-November 2022 from medical record data for the period January-December 2021 which included patient demographics, patient diagnoses, antibiotic dosage forms, routes of administration, types of antibiotics, dosage, duration of antibiotics use, and duration of treatment. Methods : Evaluation of antibiotic doses using the ATC/DDD method. The results of the study from 57 medical records that met the inclusion criteria showed that the ICU patients who used the most antibiotics were male (59.7%), the age group was >56 years (56.14%), patient diagnoses with COVID-19 (33.33%), and the dosage form was injection with the intravenous route of administration. The most frequently used antibiotics were levofloxacin (48.54%) 45.61 DDD/100 patient-days and ceftriaxone (30.06%) 28.25 DDD/100 patient-days, and the average value of Length of Stay (LOS) is 5.4 ±3.98 days with a total DDD/100 patient-days value of 93.96 (reference value of 51–67 DDD/100 patient-days). DU 90% segment namely levofloxacin (48.69%), ceftriaxone (30.16%) and meropenem (12.82%). The results of the study concluded that the use of antibiotics in ICU patients at Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital showed a high DDD/100 patient-days rate. Therefore, it is necessary for hospital to continuously monitor and evaluated the rational use of antibiotics to prevent resistance of antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":20086,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacia","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.70.e103566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Evaluation of the use of antibiotics is the control of antimicrobial resistance. The ATC/DDD method was recommended to evaluate drug use quantitatively which can be used to compare the quantity of antibiotic use between hospitals and between countries. This research was a descriptive study with retrospective data collection cross-sectional. This research was conducted at the ICU of Universitas Sumatera Utara hospital in August-November 2022 from medical record data for the period January-December 2021 which included patient demographics, patient diagnoses, antibiotic dosage forms, routes of administration, types of antibiotics, dosage, duration of antibiotics use, and duration of treatment. Methods : Evaluation of antibiotic doses using the ATC/DDD method. The results of the study from 57 medical records that met the inclusion criteria showed that the ICU patients who used the most antibiotics were male (59.7%), the age group was >56 years (56.14%), patient diagnoses with COVID-19 (33.33%), and the dosage form was injection with the intravenous route of administration. The most frequently used antibiotics were levofloxacin (48.54%) 45.61 DDD/100 patient-days and ceftriaxone (30.06%) 28.25 DDD/100 patient-days, and the average value of Length of Stay (LOS) is 5.4 ±3.98 days with a total DDD/100 patient-days value of 93.96 (reference value of 51–67 DDD/100 patient-days). DU 90% segment namely levofloxacin (48.69%), ceftriaxone (30.16%) and meropenem (12.82%). The results of the study concluded that the use of antibiotics in ICU patients at Universitas Sumatera Utara Hospital showed a high DDD/100 patient-days rate. Therefore, it is necessary for hospital to continuously monitor and evaluated the rational use of antibiotics to prevent resistance of antibiotics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏门答腊北方大学医院ICU患者使用ATC/DDD和DU 90%方法评价抗生素
背景:评价抗菌药物的使用是控制抗菌药物耐药性的关键。建议采用ATC/DDD方法定量评价药物使用情况,可用于比较医院间和国家间的抗生素使用量。本研究为回顾性横断面资料收集的描述性研究。该研究于2022年8月至11月在苏门答腊省立大学医院的ICU进行,使用了2021年1月至12月的医疗记录数据,包括患者人口统计数据、患者诊断、抗生素剂型、给药途径、抗生素类型、剂量、抗生素使用持续时间和治疗持续时间。方法:采用ATC/DDD法对抗生素剂量进行评价。对符合纳入标准的57份病历进行分析,结果显示,ICU患者中使用抗生素最多的是男性(59.7%),年龄为56岁(56.14%),诊断为COVID-19的患者(33.33%),剂型为注射剂,静脉给药途径。使用频次最高的抗生素为左氧氟沙星(48.54%)45.61 DDD/100患者-天,头孢曲松(30.06%)28.25 DDD/100患者-天,平均住院时间(LOS)为5.4±3.98天,总DDD/100患者-天为93.96,参考值为51 ~ 67 DDD/100患者-天。DU 90%部分为左氧氟沙星(48.69%)、头孢曲松(30.16%)和美罗培南(12.82%)。研究结果表明,苏门答腊北方大学医院ICU患者抗生素的使用显示出较高的DDD/100患者日率。因此,医院有必要对抗菌药物的合理使用进行持续监测和评价,以防止抗菌药物的耐药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacia
Pharmacia PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
27.30%
发文量
114
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Microneedle and drug delivery across the skin: An overview Nephroprotective effects of Equisetum ramosissimum L. extract in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats Spectroscopic and thermodynamic characterization of the interaction of a new synthesized antitumor drug candidate 2H4MBBH with human serum albumin Amstirdam coffee ameliorates Lp-PLA2 and the inflammatory response in an atherosclerosis rats A 36-year-old woman with a parathyroid cyst
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1