The Extent of Knowledge of Achieving the Final Exam Questions for the Sixth to Eleventh Grades to the Levels Depth of Knowledge "DOK" Webb in Jordan

Sami Al-Massarweh
{"title":"The Extent of Knowledge of Achieving the Final Exam Questions for the Sixth to Eleventh Grades to the Levels Depth of Knowledge "DOK" Webb in Jordan","authors":"Sami Al-Massarweh","doi":"10.5539/mas.v17n2p70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to know the extent to which the final exam questions are achieved in the basic curricula of students from sixth to eleventh in schools of the Ministry of Education in Jordan for the levels depth of knowledge (DOK) webb, and the study population is from all of all the final exams questions for the basic curricula (Islamic Education, Arabic Language, English, Mathematics, Science) that the Evaluation and Examinations Department at the Ministry of Education for the first semester of the 2015/2016 academic year, which number 30 exams.
 
 The researcher used the analytical descriptive approach through the use of the computerized statistical package program in the social sciences (SPSS), one-way analysis of variance (One-Way ANOVA), the LSD test for post comparisons, and the T-test, and the most prominent findings Study results. Depth of knowledge (DOK) skills were for the level of remembering, while the depth of knowledge skills were less for extended thinking, and the objective exams achieved the depth of knowledge in all its dimensions compared to the essay questions. there are apparent differences in the dimensions of depth of knowledge (remembering, concepts and skills, strategic thinking, extended thinking) according to the subject type variable, and the differences were indicative only in the areas of strategic thinking and extended thinking.
 
 And the differences in the field of concepts and skills were between grades (sixth, seventh, and eighth) on the one hand, and the eleventh grade on the other hand, where the differences were in favor of the eleventh grade, and the differences in extended thinking were between grades (sixth, eighth, and ninth) on the one hand, and the eleventh grade. On the other hand, the differences were in favor of the eleventh grade.","PeriodicalId":18713,"journal":{"name":"Modern Applied Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Applied Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v17n2p70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to know the extent to which the final exam questions are achieved in the basic curricula of students from sixth to eleventh in schools of the Ministry of Education in Jordan for the levels depth of knowledge (DOK) webb, and the study population is from all of all the final exams questions for the basic curricula (Islamic Education, Arabic Language, English, Mathematics, Science) that the Evaluation and Examinations Department at the Ministry of Education for the first semester of the 2015/2016 academic year, which number 30 exams. The researcher used the analytical descriptive approach through the use of the computerized statistical package program in the social sciences (SPSS), one-way analysis of variance (One-Way ANOVA), the LSD test for post comparisons, and the T-test, and the most prominent findings Study results. Depth of knowledge (DOK) skills were for the level of remembering, while the depth of knowledge skills were less for extended thinking, and the objective exams achieved the depth of knowledge in all its dimensions compared to the essay questions. there are apparent differences in the dimensions of depth of knowledge (remembering, concepts and skills, strategic thinking, extended thinking) according to the subject type variable, and the differences were indicative only in the areas of strategic thinking and extended thinking. And the differences in the field of concepts and skills were between grades (sixth, seventh, and eighth) on the one hand, and the eleventh grade on the other hand, where the differences were in favor of the eleventh grade, and the differences in extended thinking were between grades (sixth, eighth, and ninth) on the one hand, and the eleventh grade. On the other hand, the differences were in favor of the eleventh grade.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
六年级至十一年级期末试题的知识深度"DOK"韦伯在约旦
本研究旨在了解约旦教育部知识深度(DOK) webb级别学校六年级至十一年级学生基础课程中期末考试问题的实现程度,研究人群来自基础课程(伊斯兰教育,阿拉伯语,英语,数学,数学,伊斯兰教)的所有期末考试问题。2015/2016学年第一学期教育部评价与考试司,共30次考试。 & # x0D;研究者采用了分析描述性的方法,通过使用计算机化的社会科学统计软件包程序(SPSS)、单向方差分析(one-way ANOVA)、LSD检验进行后比较,以及t检验,得出了最突出的研究结果。知识深度(DOK)技能用于记忆水平,而知识深度技能较少用于扩展思维,客观考试在所有维度上都达到了与论文问题相比的知识深度。不同学科类型变量在知识深度维度(记忆、概念与技能、战略思维、拓展思维)上存在明显差异,且仅在战略思维和拓展思维领域存在指示性差异。 & # x0D;概念和技能领域的差异一方面存在于年级(六年级,七年级,八年级)之间,另一方面存在于十一年级之间,其中差异有利于十一年级,而扩展思维方面的差异存在于年级(六年级,八年级,九年级)之间,一方面存在于十一年级之间。另一方面,这些差异对高二学生有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reviewer Acknowledgements, Vol. 17, No. 2, November 2023 The Extent of Knowledge of Achieving the Final Exam Questions for the Sixth to Eleventh Grades to the Levels Depth of Knowledge "DOK" Webb in Jordan Develop and Design Small Scale UAV Applicability of Natural Coffee Husk as a Mesoporous Adsorbent for Removal of Chromium (VI) from Aquatic Environments Aircraft Ground Support Equipment: A Framework for Maintenance Strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1