Learning by Successful or Unsuccessful Experiences?

Keum Joo Kim, Eugene Santos
{"title":"Learning by Successful or Unsuccessful Experiences?","authors":"Keum Joo Kim, Eugene Santos","doi":"10.1177/21695067231192528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Humans learn from both successful and unsuccessful experiences, because useful information about how to solve complex problems can be gleaned not only from success but also from failure. In this paper, we propose a method for investigating this difference by applying Preference based Inverse Reinforcement Learning to Double Transition Models built from replays of StarCraft II. Our method provides two advantages: (1) the ability to identify integrated reward distributions from computational models composed of multiple experiences, and (2) the ability to discern differences between learning by successes and failures. Our experimental results demonstrate that reward distributions are shaped depending on the trajectories utilized to build models. Reward distributions based on successful episodes were skewed to the left, while those based on unsuccessful episodes were skewed to the right. Furthermore, we found that players with symmetric triple reward distributions had a high probability of winning the game.","PeriodicalId":74544,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting","volume":"33 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231192528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans learn from both successful and unsuccessful experiences, because useful information about how to solve complex problems can be gleaned not only from success but also from failure. In this paper, we propose a method for investigating this difference by applying Preference based Inverse Reinforcement Learning to Double Transition Models built from replays of StarCraft II. Our method provides two advantages: (1) the ability to identify integrated reward distributions from computational models composed of multiple experiences, and (2) the ability to discern differences between learning by successes and failures. Our experimental results demonstrate that reward distributions are shaped depending on the trajectories utilized to build models. Reward distributions based on successful episodes were skewed to the left, while those based on unsuccessful episodes were skewed to the right. Furthermore, we found that players with symmetric triple reward distributions had a high probability of winning the game.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从成功或不成功的经验中学习?
人类从成功和不成功的经验中学习,因为关于如何解决复杂问题的有用信息不仅可以从成功中收集,也可以从失败中收集。在本文中,我们提出了一种研究这种差异的方法,将基于偏好的逆强化学习应用于从《星际争霸2》重玩中建立的双过渡模型。我们的方法提供了两个优势:(1)能够从由多个经验组成的计算模型中识别综合奖励分布;(2)能够辨别成功和失败学习之间的差异。我们的实验结果表明,奖励分布的形状取决于用于构建模型的轨迹。基于成功情节的奖励分配向左倾斜,而基于不成功情节的奖励分配向右倾斜。此外,我们发现拥有对称三重奖励分配的玩家更有可能赢得游戏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is vitamin A an antioxidant? Investigating Human Physiological Responses to Work-Related Stress Phishing in Social Media: Investigating Training Techniques on Instagram Shop Factor Analysis of a Generalized Video Game Experience Measure A Completion Rate Conundrum: Reducing bias in the Single Usability Metric
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1