Rallying Around Empty Signifiers: Understanding and Defiing Anit-Givernemnt Protest in the Netherlands

Isabelle Frens, Jelle van Buuren, Edwin Bakker
{"title":"Rallying Around Empty Signifiers: Understanding and Defiing Anit-Givernemnt Protest in the Netherlands","authors":"Isabelle Frens, Jelle van Buuren, Edwin Bakker","doi":"10.19165/obvk6256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As in many other parts of Europe, anti-government protest has been a topic of political and academic discussion in the Netherlands for some years. The definition of what anti-government protest entails and which groups and individuals it refers to is not as straightforward as it may seem. Where other institutions have attempted to place anti-governmental protest movements in frameworks of traditional extremist movements, the Dutch authorities describe the anti-government protestors as a group that is characterised by its pluriformity and fluidity. In 2022, they have even changed the term ‘anti-governmental’ to ‘anti-institutional’ to more broadly refer to the set of targets that the movement opposes, which includes government, but also the media, the scientific community, experts and the judicial system. In this paper we try to understand the anti-government, or anti-institutional, protest in the Netherlands using a different lens. We use Ernesto Laclau’s discourse theory and its concept of empty signifiers to show how opposed interests and goals can be seen as a unified ideology to its proponents. Instead of trying to primarily define the group of people who are anti-government by their actions or characteristics, we look at how those actors define themselves and how they see their struggle against the authorities. We describe the rise and dynamics of anti-government protest in the Netherlands since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on “genealogies” and the eclectic topics of the protest movement. We compare our observations with the definition of anti-governmental protest and the anti-institutional narrative as used by the authorities. We arrive at the conclusion that analysing the anti-government protest through the lens of their shared ideas and grievances gives us more insight into the nature and dynamics of this movement than solely looking through the lens of the potential threat to the","PeriodicalId":83863,"journal":{"name":"Policy brief (Commonwealth Fund)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy brief (Commonwealth Fund)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19165/obvk6256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As in many other parts of Europe, anti-government protest has been a topic of political and academic discussion in the Netherlands for some years. The definition of what anti-government protest entails and which groups and individuals it refers to is not as straightforward as it may seem. Where other institutions have attempted to place anti-governmental protest movements in frameworks of traditional extremist movements, the Dutch authorities describe the anti-government protestors as a group that is characterised by its pluriformity and fluidity. In 2022, they have even changed the term ‘anti-governmental’ to ‘anti-institutional’ to more broadly refer to the set of targets that the movement opposes, which includes government, but also the media, the scientific community, experts and the judicial system. In this paper we try to understand the anti-government, or anti-institutional, protest in the Netherlands using a different lens. We use Ernesto Laclau’s discourse theory and its concept of empty signifiers to show how opposed interests and goals can be seen as a unified ideology to its proponents. Instead of trying to primarily define the group of people who are anti-government by their actions or characteristics, we look at how those actors define themselves and how they see their struggle against the authorities. We describe the rise and dynamics of anti-government protest in the Netherlands since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on “genealogies” and the eclectic topics of the protest movement. We compare our observations with the definition of anti-governmental protest and the anti-institutional narrative as used by the authorities. We arrive at the conclusion that analysing the anti-government protest through the lens of their shared ideas and grievances gives us more insight into the nature and dynamics of this movement than solely looking through the lens of the potential threat to the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围绕空的能指集会:理解和定义荷兰的反政府抗议
与欧洲许多其他国家一样,反政府抗议在荷兰已成为政治和学术讨论的话题多年。反政府抗议包括什么,涉及哪些团体和个人,其定义并不像看起来那么简单。在其他机构试图将反政府抗议运动置于传统极端主义运动框架内的情况下,荷兰当局将反政府抗议者描述为一个以多样性和流动性为特征的群体。在2022年,他们甚至将“反政府”一词改为“反机构”,以更广泛地指代运动反对的一系列目标,其中包括政府,但也包括媒体、科学界、专家和司法系统。在本文中,我们试图用不同的视角来理解荷兰的反政府或反体制抗议。我们使用埃内斯托·拉克劳的话语理论及其空能指的概念来展示对立的利益和目标如何被其支持者视为统一的意识形态。我们不是试图通过他们的行为或特征来主要定义反政府的人,而是看看这些行动者如何定义自己,以及他们如何看待他们与当局的斗争。我们描述了自2019冠状病毒病大流行开始以来荷兰反政府抗议活动的兴起和动态,重点关注抗议运动的“谱系”和折衷主题。我们将我们的观察与反政府抗议的定义和当局使用的反制度叙事进行比较。我们得出的结论是,通过他们共同的想法和不满来分析反政府抗议活动,可以让我们更深入地了解这场运动的性质和动态,而不仅仅是通过对政府的潜在威胁来分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Far-Right Violence Actually Increasing in Australia? Tracking Far-Right Terrorism and Violence in Australia Studying Terror Through my I's: Autoethnographic Insider/Outsider Reflections of as Arab-Muslim Public Health Crisis and Hate Crimes: Deciphering the Proliferation of Anti-Asian Violence in the US Before and During Covid-19 The Metaverse and Terrorism: Threats and Challenges Rallying Around Empty Signifiers: Understanding and Defiing Anit-Givernemnt Protest in the Netherlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1