Community-Based Joint Business Model Design for Solutions to Implementing Technology Innovation in Small Farmers

Yudi Rustandi, Restu Wulandari, Mirna Savitri
{"title":"Community-Based Joint Business Model Design for Solutions to Implementing Technology Innovation in Small Farmers","authors":"Yudi Rustandi, Restu Wulandari, Mirna Savitri","doi":"10.11137/1982-3908_2023_46_55775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In general, small-scale farmers in rural areas often experience obstacles in implementing technological innovations offered by agricultural extension workers. Obstacles can come from within the individual breeder himself. The theory of small farmers and the theory of collective action is expected to solve the obstacles to implementing these technological innovations. This study aims to analyze and find solutions to the obstacles to implementing technological innovation at the individual level of small farmers in rural areas. Researchers took case study research with a research and development (RD) method approach to find the construction of a joint venture model. Qualitative methods are used in Focus Group Discussion (FGD) activities. At the same time, the quantitative descriptive research method is to evaluate the results of implementing the joint venture model. The population and the evaluation research sample were members of the Ampelsari Makmur Jaya farmer group in Pasuruan Regency and the La Tulip Farmer/Women Group in Lamongan Regency. The number of respondents for the perception evaluation was 68, determined as a total sample. Data was collected through participation techniques, in-depth interviews, FGDs and surveys. The evaluation perception was analyzed using descriptive analysis and Score T. The evaluation of respondents’ perceptions resulted in the farmers accepting the establishment of community-based business units (complete feed and pastured chicken business). The solution is also considered effective in solving the obstacles to applying technological innovation by rural and small-scale farmers in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":39973,"journal":{"name":"Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11137/1982-3908_2023_46_55775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In general, small-scale farmers in rural areas often experience obstacles in implementing technological innovations offered by agricultural extension workers. Obstacles can come from within the individual breeder himself. The theory of small farmers and the theory of collective action is expected to solve the obstacles to implementing these technological innovations. This study aims to analyze and find solutions to the obstacles to implementing technological innovation at the individual level of small farmers in rural areas. Researchers took case study research with a research and development (RD) method approach to find the construction of a joint venture model. Qualitative methods are used in Focus Group Discussion (FGD) activities. At the same time, the quantitative descriptive research method is to evaluate the results of implementing the joint venture model. The population and the evaluation research sample were members of the Ampelsari Makmur Jaya farmer group in Pasuruan Regency and the La Tulip Farmer/Women Group in Lamongan Regency. The number of respondents for the perception evaluation was 68, determined as a total sample. Data was collected through participation techniques, in-depth interviews, FGDs and surveys. The evaluation perception was analyzed using descriptive analysis and Score T. The evaluation of respondents’ perceptions resulted in the farmers accepting the establishment of community-based business units (complete feed and pastured chicken business). The solution is also considered effective in solving the obstacles to applying technological innovation by rural and small-scale farmers in Indonesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以社区为基础的联合商业模式设计,以解决小农实施技术创新的问题
一般来说,农村地区的小农在实施农业推广工作者提供的技术革新方面经常遇到障碍。障碍可能来自个体繁殖者自身。小农理论和集体行动理论有望解决实施这些技术创新的障碍。本研究旨在分析农村小农个体层面实施技术创新的障碍并寻求解决方案。研究人员采用研发(r&d)方法进行案例研究,寻找合资企业模型的构建。在焦点小组讨论(FGD)活动中使用定性方法。同时,采用定量描述性研究方法对合资模式的实施效果进行评价。人口和评估研究样本是Pasuruan县的Ampelsari Makmur Jaya农民小组和Lamongan县的La Tulip农民/妇女小组的成员。知觉评估的应答者数量为68,确定为总样本。数据是通过参与技术、深度访谈、fgd和调查收集的。评价感知采用描述性分析和得分t进行分析。评价受访者的感知导致农民接受建立社区经营单位(全饲料和放养鸡业务)。这种解决办法也被认为有效地解决了印度尼西亚农村和小农应用技术创新的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias
Anuario do Instituto de Geociencias Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: The Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Anuário IGEO) is an official publication of the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ – CCMN) with the objective to publish original scientific papers of broad interest in the field of Geology, Paleontology, Geography and Meteorology.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Precipitation Simulations at the Subseasonal Range in the Sao Francisco River Basin, Brazil Classification of Urban Solid Waste Collected with the Use of Ecobarriers in Watercourses in the Municipality of Caçapava do Sul, RS How Eco-Spatial Edutourism Support Sustainability in Coastal Areas in South Malang, Indonesia? Semiautomatic Mapping of Center Pivot Irrigated Areas Using Sentinel-2 Images and GEOBIA Approach Characterization and Geological Meaning of the Crystalline Basement Occurrence in the Unaí Region, Minas Gerais State (Central Brasilia Belt)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1