How organisations regulate Muslim body practices: a comparison of schools, hospitals, and swimming pools

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Comparative Migration Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1186/s40878-023-00355-y
Maja Apelt, Annika Koch, Ines Michalowski, Kaspar Molzberger, Liane Schenk, Max Oliver Schmidt
{"title":"How organisations regulate Muslim body practices: a comparison of schools, hospitals, and swimming pools","authors":"Maja Apelt, Annika Koch, Ines Michalowski, Kaspar Molzberger, Liane Schenk, Max Oliver Schmidt","doi":"10.1186/s40878-023-00355-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In a comparison of three human service organisations in which the human body plays a key role, we examine how organisations regulate religious body practices. We concentrate on Muslim norms of dressing and undressing as a potential focal point of cultural and religious diversity. Inspired by Ray’s (2019) idea of racialized organizations, we assume that state-run organizations in Germany are characterized by a strong commitment to religious tolerance and non-discrimination but also marked by anti-Muslim sentiment prevalent among the German population. Our study looks for mechanism that explain how Human Service Organizations accommodate Muslim body practices. It draws on qualitative empirical data collected in state-run hospitals, schools and swimming pools in Germany. Our analyses show that the organizations draw on formal and informal rules at the organizational level to accommodate Islam. We identify five general organizational mechanisms that may hinder Muslim accommodation in human service organizations. In particular, we see a risk of decoupling between the expectation of religious tolerance and processes that lead to informal discrimination, driven mainly by the difficulty of controlling group dynamics among users.","PeriodicalId":37051,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Migration Studies","volume":"169 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-023-00355-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In a comparison of three human service organisations in which the human body plays a key role, we examine how organisations regulate religious body practices. We concentrate on Muslim norms of dressing and undressing as a potential focal point of cultural and religious diversity. Inspired by Ray’s (2019) idea of racialized organizations, we assume that state-run organizations in Germany are characterized by a strong commitment to religious tolerance and non-discrimination but also marked by anti-Muslim sentiment prevalent among the German population. Our study looks for mechanism that explain how Human Service Organizations accommodate Muslim body practices. It draws on qualitative empirical data collected in state-run hospitals, schools and swimming pools in Germany. Our analyses show that the organizations draw on formal and informal rules at the organizational level to accommodate Islam. We identify five general organizational mechanisms that may hinder Muslim accommodation in human service organizations. In particular, we see a risk of decoupling between the expectation of religious tolerance and processes that lead to informal discrimination, driven mainly by the difficulty of controlling group dynamics among users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织如何规范穆斯林的身体习俗:学校、医院和游泳池的比较
在人体发挥关键作用的三个人类服务组织的比较中,我们研究了组织如何规范宗教团体的做法。我们专注于穆斯林的穿衣和脱衣规范,作为文化和宗教多样性的潜在焦点。受Ray(2019)关于种族化组织的想法的启发,我们假设德国的国有组织的特点是对宗教宽容和非歧视的强烈承诺,但也以德国人口中普遍存在的反穆斯林情绪为特征。我们的研究寻找解释人类服务组织如何适应穆斯林身体实践的机制。它借鉴了在德国国营医院、学校和游泳池收集的定性经验数据。我们的分析表明,组织在组织层面上利用正式和非正式的规则来适应伊斯兰教。我们确定了五种可能阻碍穆斯林在人类服务组织中住宿的一般组织机制。特别是,我们看到了对宗教宽容的期望与导致非正式歧视的过程之间脱钩的风险,这主要是由于难以控制用户之间的群体动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Migration Studies
Comparative Migration Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.60%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
De-bordering policies at the city scale: strategies for building resilience in Barcelona's migration governance Life experiences and cultural adaptation among migrant workers in Malaysia Economic and labour market impacts of migration in Austria: an agent-based modelling approach. Forecasting migration movements using prediction markets. Correction: Between settlement, double return and re-emigration: motivations for future mobility of Polish and Lithuanian return migrants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1